NUMG vs. NULV

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

NUMG (Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF) and NULV (Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NUMG is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI TIAA ESG USA Mid Cap Growth, while NULV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the MSCI TIAA ESG USA Large Cap Value. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NUMG returned -1.11%/yr vs 8.98%/yr for NULV. Their 0.69 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. NUMG charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for NULV.

Performance

NUMG vs. NULV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF (NUMG) and Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF (NULV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUMG achieves a -3.57% return, which is significantly lower than NULV's 14.74% return.

NUMG

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: -1.85%
• 6M: 1.90%
• YTD: -3.57%
• 1Y: -3.04%
• 3Y*: 4.79%
• 5Y*: -1.11%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.07%

NULV

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: 1.89%
• 6M: 10.05%
• YTD: 14.74%
• 1Y: 26.60%
• 3Y*: 15.33%
• 5Y*: 8.98%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
NULV Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF	$3.66M	$3.32M	$3.65M
NUMG Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF	$601.10K	$621.84K	$1.03M

NUMG vs. NULV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NUMG Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF	-3.57%	0.78%	11.99%	20.47%	-28.31%	12.27%	45.73%	34.87%	-5.79%	19.00%
NULV Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF	14.74%	16.31%	11.88%	7.60%	-10.09%	23.46%	1.87%	27.26%	-4.90%	15.67%

Correlation

The correlation between NUMG and NULV is 0.65, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.65
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.71
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2016	0.69

The correlation between NUMG and NULV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

NUMG vs. NULV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NUMG	NULV
Technology	32.4%	25.1%
Industrials	19.2%	10.7%
Healthcare	16.3%	13.7%
Consumer Cyclical	15.1%	1.6%
Financial Services	7.9%	17.4%
Communication Services	4.7%	8.7%
Real Estate	2.3%	3.2%
Basic Materials	2.2%	3.0%
Utilities	1.2%	4.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	9.1%
Energy	-	3.4%

Return for Risk

NUMG vs. NULV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NUMG

NUMG Risk / Return Rank: 7
NUMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
NUMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
NUMG Omega Ratio Rank: 7
NUMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
NUMG Martin Ratio Rank: 6

NULV

NULV Risk / Return Rank: 90
NULV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
NULV Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
NULV Omega Ratio Rank: 90
NULV Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
NULV Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NUMG vs. NULV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF (NUMG) and Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF (NULV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NUMG	NULV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.29	2.36	-2.65
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.28	3.32	-3.60
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	1.42	-0.45
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.28	3.52	-3.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.69	14.23	-14.91

NUMG vs. NULV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUMG Sharpe Ratio is -0.29, which is lower than the NULV Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUMG and NULV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NUMG vs. NULV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUMG drawdown since its inception was -38.85%, which is greater than NULV's maximum drawdown of -36.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUMG and NULV.

Drawdown Indicators

	NUMG	NULV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.85%	-36.99%	-1.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.56%	-7.28%	-12.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.58%	-15.07%	-11.51%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.85%	-21.47%	-17.38%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.22%	-0.23%	-11.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.38%	-4.92%	-6.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.88%	1.80%	+6.08%

Volatility

NUMG vs. NULV - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF (NUMG) has a higher volatility of 4.15% compared to Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF (NULV) at 2.72%. This indicates that NUMG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NULV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NUMG	NULV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.15%	2.72%	+1.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.79%	8.11%	+6.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.86%	10.90%	+7.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.96%	14.28%	+8.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.80%	16.93%	+4.87%

NUMG vs. NULV - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUMG has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than NULV's 0.26% expense ratio.

Dividends

NUMG vs. NULV - Dividend Comparison

NUMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than NULV's 1.43% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NULV Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF	1.43%	1.64%	2.09%	2.55%	2.12%	4.52%	1.42%	1.47%	3.73%	1.22%
NUMG Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF	0.01%	0.01%	0.06%	0.18%	0.18%	12.76%	3.82%	0.27%	5.14%	0.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NUMG and NULV in my portfolio?

NUMG and NULV have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NUMG or NULV?

NUMG has higher volatility (4.15%) compared to NULV (2.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUMG dropped -38.85% vs NULV's -36.99%.

Which ETF is better, NUMG or NULV?

On 5-year performance, NULV leads with 8.98% vs -1.11% for NUMG. On fees, NULV is cheaper at 0.26% per year. On volatility, NULV has been the lower-risk option at 2.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NUMG or NULV?

Over the 5-year period, NULV has performed better with a 8.98% return vs -1.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NUMG or NULV?

NULV is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for NUMG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NUMG or NULV?

NULV has the higher dividend yield at 1.43%, compared with 0.01% for NUMG.

What is the main difference between NUMG and NULV?

NUMG is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while NULV is Large Cap Value Equities. NUMG tracks MSCI TIAA ESG USA Mid Cap Growth, while NULV tracks MSCI TIAA ESG USA Large Cap Value. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for NUMG and 0.26% for NULV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NULV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.