PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NUMG vs. NULV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NUMG vs. NULV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF (NUMG) and Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF (NULV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUMG achieves a -0.40% return, which is significantly lower than NULV's 12.83% return.


NUMG

1D
-1.63%
1M
5.76%
YTD
-0.40%
6M
0.31%
1Y
-0.49%
3Y*
8.47%
5Y*
0.99%
10Y*

NULV

1D
-0.70%
1M
2.62%
YTD
12.83%
6M
13.15%
1Y
26.76%
3Y*
17.26%
5Y*
8.48%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUMG vs. NULV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NUMG
Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF
-0.40%0.78%11.99%20.47%-28.31%12.27%45.73%34.87%-5.79%19.00%
NULV
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF
12.83%16.31%11.88%7.60%-10.09%23.46%1.87%27.26%-4.90%15.67%

Correlation

The correlation between NUMG and NULV is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2016

0.69

The correlation between NUMG and NULV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

NUMG vs. NULV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NUMG
NULV

Technology

28.7%
20.1%

Industrials

26.5%
10.2%

Healthcare

13.9%
11.6%

Consumer Cyclical

11.8%
4.0%

Financial Services

6.5%
18.8%

Communication Services

5.2%
13.7%

Real Estate

3.7%
2.7%

Basic Materials

2.3%
2.3%

Utilities

1.4%
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

9.2%

Energy

-

4.1%

Technology

NUMG
28.7%
NULV
20.1%

Industrials

NUMG
26.5%
NULV
10.2%

Healthcare

NUMG
13.9%
NULV
11.6%

Consumer Cyclical

NUMG
11.8%
NULV
4.0%

Financial Services

NUMG
6.5%
NULV
18.8%

Communication Services

NUMG
5.2%
NULV
13.7%

Real Estate

NUMG
3.7%
NULV
2.7%

Basic Materials

NUMG
2.3%
NULV
2.3%

Utilities

NUMG
1.4%
NULV
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

NUMG

-

NULV
9.2%

Energy

NUMG

-

NULV
4.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NUMG vs. NULV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUMG
NUMG Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
NUMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUMG Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
NUMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUMG Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

NULV
NULV Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
NULV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NULV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
NULV Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
NULV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
NULV Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUMG vs. NULV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF (NUMG) and Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF (NULV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NUMGNULVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.45

-0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.03

3.69

-3.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.06

15.52

-15.59

NUMG vs. NULV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUMG Sharpe Ratio is -0.03, which is lower than the NULV Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUMG and NULV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NUMGNULVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

2.52

-2.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

0.59

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.60

-0.16

Drawdowns

NUMG vs. NULV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUMG drawdown since its inception was -38.85%, which is greater than NULV's maximum drawdown of -36.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUMG and NULV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NUMGNULVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.85%

-36.99%

-1.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.71%

-7.28%

-12.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.58%

-15.07%

-11.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.85%

-21.47%

-17.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.34%

-0.70%

-8.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.37%

-4.98%

-6.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.59%

1.73%

+5.86%

Volatility

NUMG vs. NULV - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF (NUMG) has a higher volatility of 4.75% compared to Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF (NULV) at 2.55%. This indicates that NUMG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NULV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NUMGNULVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.75%

2.55%

+2.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.59%

7.94%

+6.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.18%

10.67%

+7.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.86%

14.33%

+8.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.87%

17.02%

+4.85%

NUMG vs. NULV - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUMG has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than NULV's 0.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

NUMG vs. NULV - Dividend Comparison

NUMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than NULV's 1.45% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
NULV
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF
1.45%1.64%2.09%2.55%2.12%4.52%1.42%1.47%3.73%1.22%
NUMG
Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF
0.01%0.01%0.06%0.18%0.18%12.76%3.82%0.27%5.14%0.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


NUMG and NULV have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NUMG has higher volatility (4.75%) compared to NULV (2.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUMG dropped -38.85% vs NULV's -36.99%.

On 5-year performance, NULV leads with 8.48% vs 0.99% for NUMG. On fees, NULV is cheaper at 0.26% per year. On volatility, NULV has been the lower-risk option at 2.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, NULV has performed better with a 8.48% return vs 0.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NULV is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for NUMG.

NULV has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 0.01% for NUMG.

NUMG is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while NULV is Large Cap Value Equities. NUMG tracks MSCI TIAA ESG USA Mid Cap Growth, while NULV tracks MSCI TIAA ESG USA Large Cap Value. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for NUMG and 0.26% for NULV.

NULV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NUMG and NULV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer