PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NUMG vs. NCLO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NUMG vs. NCLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF (NUMG) and Nuveen AA-BBB CLO ETF (NCLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NUMG vs. NCLO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
NUMG
Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF
-13.96%0.78%-6.13%
NCLO
Nuveen AA-BBB CLO ETF
0.37%6.28%0.35%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUMG achieves a -13.96% return, which is significantly lower than NCLO's 0.37% return.


NUMG

1D
3.29%
1M
-6.68%
YTD
-13.96%
6M
-15.60%
1Y
-4.28%
3Y*
2.51%
5Y*
-1.83%
10Y*

NCLO

1D
0.12%
1M
-0.08%
YTD
0.37%
6M
2.12%
1Y
5.53%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NUMG vs. NCLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUMG has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than NCLO's 0.26% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

NUMG vs. NCLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUMG
NUMG Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
NUMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUMG Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
NUMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUMG Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

NCLO
NCLO Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
NCLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NCLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
NCLO Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
NCLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
NCLO Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUMG vs. NCLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF (NUMG) and Nuveen AA-BBB CLO ETF (NCLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NUMGNCLODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.18

1.31

-1.50

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.10

1.73

-1.84

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.35

-0.37

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.21

1.88

-2.09

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.65

11.07

-11.72

NUMG vs. NCLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUMG Sharpe Ratio is -0.18, which is lower than the NCLO Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUMG and NCLO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NUMGNCLODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

1.31

-1.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

1.45

-1.08

Correlation

The correlation between NUMG and NCLO is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

NUMG vs. NCLO - Dividend Comparison

NUMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than NCLO's 5.99% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
NUMG
Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF
0.01%0.01%0.06%0.18%0.18%12.76%3.82%0.27%5.14%0.56%
NCLO
Nuveen AA-BBB CLO ETF
5.99%6.09%0.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

NUMG vs. NCLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUMG drawdown since its inception was -38.85%, which is greater than NCLO's maximum drawdown of -3.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUMG and NCLO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NUMGNCLODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.85%

-3.05%

-35.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.71%

-3.05%

-16.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.68%

-0.48%

-21.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.30%

-0.21%

-11.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.47%

0.52%

+5.95%

Volatility

NUMG vs. NCLO - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF (NUMG) has a higher volatility of 6.83% compared to Nuveen AA-BBB CLO ETF (NCLO) at 3.04%. This indicates that NUMG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NCLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NUMGNCLODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.83%

3.04%

+3.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.15%

3.29%

+10.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.42%

4.23%

+19.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.83%

3.77%

+19.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.92%

3.77%

+18.15%