NULV vs. NUMV
NULV (Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF) and NUMV (Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NULV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the MSCI TIAA ESG USA Large Cap Value, while NUMV is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the TIAA ESG USA Mid-Cap Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NULV returned 8.68%/yr vs 6.81%/yr for NUMV. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NULV charges 0.26%/yr vs 0.31%/yr for NUMV.
Performance
NULV vs. NUMV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NULV achieves a 13.87% return, which is significantly higher than NUMV's 11.07% return.
NULV
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- 2.54%
- YTD
- 13.87%
- 6M
- 14.07%
- 1Y
- 28.31%
- 3Y*
- 17.85%
- 5Y*
- 8.68%
- 10Y*
- —
NUMV
- 1D
- 1.21%
- 1M
- 4.31%
- YTD
- 11.07%
- 6M
- 12.41%
- 1Y
- 25.49%
- 3Y*
- 17.54%
- 5Y*
- 6.81%
- 10Y*
- —
NULV vs. NUMV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NULV Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF | 13.87% | 16.31% | 11.88% | 7.60% | -10.09% | 23.46% | 1.87% | 27.26% | -4.90% | 15.67% |
NUMV Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF | 11.07% | 14.05% | 12.31% | 8.43% | -14.97% | 31.15% | 0.91% | 29.81% | -11.91% | 14.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between NULV and NUMV is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2016 | 0.89 |
The correlation between NULV and NUMV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
NULV vs. NUMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NULV
NUMV
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
NULV
NUMV
Financial Services
NULV
NUMV
Communication Services
NULV
NUMV
Healthcare
NULV
NUMV
Industrials
NULV
NUMV
Consumer Defensive
NULV
NUMV
Energy
NULV
NUMV
Consumer Cyclical
NULV
NUMV
Utilities
NULV
NUMV
Real Estate
NULV
NUMV
Basic Materials
NULV
NUMV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NULV vs. NUMV — Risk / Return Rank
NULV
NUMV
NULV vs. NUMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF (NULV) and Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF (NUMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NULV | NUMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.35 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.91 | 2.94 | +0.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.42 | 11.14 | +5.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NULV | NUMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.66 | 2.05 | +0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.39 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.46 | +0.15 |
Drawdowns
NULV vs. NUMV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NULV drawdown since its inception was -36.99%, smaller than the maximum NUMV drawdown of -43.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NULV and NUMV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NULV | NUMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.99% | -43.46% | +6.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.28% | -8.71% | +1.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.07% | -19.53% | +4.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.47% | -25.71% | +4.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.97% | -6.89% | +1.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.73% | 2.29% | -0.56% |
Volatility
NULV vs. NUMV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF (NULV) is 2.52%, while Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF (NUMV) has a volatility of 3.04%. This indicates that NULV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NUMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NULV | NUMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.52% | 3.04% | -0.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.98% | 9.20% | -1.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.68% | 12.49% | -1.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.33% | 17.40% | -3.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.02% | 19.77% | -2.75% |
NULV vs. NUMV - Expense Ratio Comparison
NULV has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is lower than NUMV's 0.31% expense ratio.
Dividends
NULV vs. NUMV - Dividend Comparison
NULV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, more than NUMV's 1.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NULV Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF | 1.44% | 1.64% | 2.09% | 2.55% | 2.12% | 4.52% | 1.42% | 1.47% | 3.73% | 1.22% |
NUMV Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF | 1.38% | 1.53% | 1.81% | 2.20% | 5.78% | 6.62% | 1.38% | 2.40% | 4.01% | 0.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, NULV and NUMV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
NUMV has higher volatility (3.04%) compared to NULV (2.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NULV dropped -36.99% vs NUMV's -43.46%.
On 5-year performance, NULV leads with 8.68% vs 6.81% for NUMV. On fees, NULV is cheaper at 0.26% per year. On volatility, NULV has been the lower-risk option at 2.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, NULV has performed better with a 8.68% return vs 6.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NULV is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for NUMV.
NULV has the higher dividend yield at 1.44%, compared with 1.38% for NUMV.
NULV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while NUMV is Mid Cap Value Equities. NULV tracks MSCI TIAA ESG USA Large Cap Value, while NUMV tracks TIAA ESG USA Mid-Cap Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for NULV and 0.31% for NUMV.
NULV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NULV and NUMV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer