PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NULV vs. NSCR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NULV vs. NSCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF (NULV) and Nuveen Sustainable Core ETF (NSCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NULV vs. NSCR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
NULV
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF
1.78%16.31%7.03%
NSCR
Nuveen Sustainable Core ETF
-6.75%13.32%12.92%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NULV achieves a 1.78% return, which is significantly higher than NSCR's -6.75% return.


NULV

1D
0.77%
1M
-4.14%
YTD
1.78%
6M
6.21%
1Y
15.16%
3Y*
12.72%
5Y*
7.40%
10Y*

NSCR

1D
0.84%
1M
-5.16%
YTD
-6.75%
6M
-4.73%
1Y
12.18%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NULV vs. NSCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

NULV has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is lower than NSCR's 0.45% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

NULV vs. NSCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NULV
NULV Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
NULV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NULV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
NULV Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
NULV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
NULV Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

NSCR
NSCR Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
NSCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NSCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
NSCR Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
NSCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
NSCR Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NULV vs. NSCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF (NULV) and Nuveen Sustainable Core ETF (NSCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NULVNSCRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.02

0.64

+0.38

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.47

1.04

+0.43

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.15

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.33

1.01

+0.33

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.95

3.67

+2.29

NULV vs. NSCR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NULV Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is higher than the NSCR Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NULV and NSCR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NULVNSCRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.02

0.64

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.54

0.00

Correlation

The correlation between NULV and NSCR is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

NULV vs. NSCR - Dividend Comparison

NULV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, less than NSCR's 2.05% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
NULV
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF
1.61%1.64%2.09%2.55%2.12%4.52%1.42%1.47%3.73%1.22%
NSCR
Nuveen Sustainable Core ETF
2.05%1.92%1.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

NULV vs. NSCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NULV drawdown since its inception was -36.99%, which is greater than NSCR's maximum drawdown of -20.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NULV and NSCR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NULVNSCRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.99%

-20.75%

-16.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.32%

-12.47%

+1.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.62%

-8.48%

+3.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.05%

-2.94%

-2.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.54%

3.42%

-0.88%

Volatility

NULV vs. NSCR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF (NULV) is 4.22%, while Nuveen Sustainable Core ETF (NSCR) has a volatility of 5.52%. This indicates that NULV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NSCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NULVNSCRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.22%

5.52%

-1.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.15%

10.22%

-2.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.89%

19.12%

-4.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.31%

16.62%

-2.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.11%

16.62%

+0.49%