NULV vs. NCLO

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

NULV (Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF) and NCLO (Nuveen AA-BBB CLO ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NULV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the MSCI TIAA ESG USA Large Cap Value, while NCLO is a CLO fund tracking the JP Morgan CLO A Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, NULV returned 22.85% vs 6.89% for NCLO. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.26% expense ratio.

Performance

NULV vs. NCLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF (NULV) and Nuveen AA-BBB CLO ETF (NCLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NULV achieves a 10.72% return, which is significantly higher than NCLO's 3.27% return.

NULV

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: -2.04%
• YTD: 10.72%
• 6M: 9.48%
• 1Y: 22.85%
• 3Y*: 16.18%
• 5Y*: 8.42%
• 10Y*: —

NCLO

• 1D: 1.00%
• 1M: 1.47%
• YTD: 3.27%
• 6M: 3.47%
• 1Y: 6.89%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NULV vs. NCLO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
NULV Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF	10.72%	16.31%	-3.81%
NCLO Nuveen AA-BBB CLO ETF	3.27%	6.28%	0.31%

Correlation

The correlation between NULV and NCLO is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2024	0.19

The correlation between NULV and NCLO shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

NULV vs. NCLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NULV

NULV Risk / Return Rank: 75
NULV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
NULV Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
NULV Omega Ratio Rank: 74
NULV Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
NULV Martin Ratio Rank: 76

NCLO

NCLO Risk / Return Rank: 70
NCLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
NCLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
NCLO Omega Ratio Rank: 92
NCLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
NCLO Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NULV vs. NCLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF (NULV) and Nuveen AA-BBB CLO ETF (NCLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NULV	NCLO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.12	1.84	+0.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.01	2.42	+0.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.54	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.15	2.26	+0.89
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.72	14.95	-2.23

NULV vs. NCLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NULV Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the NCLO Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NULV and NCLO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NULV vs. NCLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NULV drawdown since its inception was -36.99%, which is greater than NCLO's maximum drawdown of -3.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NULV and NCLO.

Drawdown Indicators

	NULV	NCLO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.99%	-3.05%	-33.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.28%	-3.05%	-4.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.07%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.47%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.77%	0.00%	-2.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.96%	-0.20%	-4.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.80%	0.46%	+1.34%

Volatility

NULV vs. NCLO - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF (NULV) has a higher volatility of 3.28% compared to Nuveen AA-BBB CLO ETF (NCLO) at 1.36%. This indicates that NULV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NCLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NULV	NCLO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.28%	1.36%	+1.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.28%	3.60%	+4.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.84%	3.76%	+7.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.32%	3.75%	+10.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.99%	3.75%	+13.24%

NULV vs. NCLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NULV and NCLO have an expense ratio of 0.26%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

NULV vs. NCLO - Dividend Comparison

NULV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, less than NCLO's 5.71% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NCLO Nuveen AA-BBB CLO ETF	5.71%	6.09%	0.35%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NULV Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF	1.48%	1.64%	2.09%	2.55%	2.12%	4.52%	1.42%	1.47%	3.73%	1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NULV and NCLO in my portfolio?

NULV and NCLO have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NULV or NCLO?

NULV has higher volatility (3.28%) compared to NCLO (1.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NULV dropped -36.99% vs NCLO's -3.05%.

Which ETF is better, NULV or NCLO?

On 1-year performance, NULV leads with 22.85% vs 6.89% for NCLO. Both ETFs have the same 0.26% expense ratio. On volatility, NCLO has been the lower-risk option at 1.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NULV or NCLO?

Over the 1-year period, NULV has performed better with a 22.85% return vs 6.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NULV or NCLO?

NULV and NCLO have the same expense ratio: 0.26% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NULV or NCLO?

NCLO has the higher dividend yield at 5.71%, compared with 1.48% for NULV.

What is the main difference between NULV and NCLO?

NULV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while NCLO is CLO. NULV tracks MSCI TIAA ESG USA Large Cap Value, while NCLO tracks JP Morgan CLO A Index.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NULV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.