PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NULG vs. NHYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NULG vs. NHYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF (NULG) and Nuveen High Yield Municipal Income ETF (NHYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NULG achieves a 16.76% return, which is significantly higher than NHYM's 2.94% return.


NULG

1D
-0.39%
1M
8.41%
YTD
16.76%
6M
15.85%
1Y
26.42%
3Y*
24.67%
5Y*
14.66%
10Y*

NHYM

1D
0.17%
1M
1.24%
YTD
2.94%
6M
3.46%
1Y
8.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NULG vs. NHYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NULG and NHYM is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2025

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NULG vs. NHYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NULG
NULG Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
NULG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NULG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
NULG Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
NULG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
NULG Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

NHYM
NHYM Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
NHYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NHYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
NHYM Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
NHYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
NHYM Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NULG vs. NHYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF (NULG) and Nuveen High Yield Municipal Income ETF (NHYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NULGNHYMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.39

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

2.96

-1.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.22

8.68

-2.46

NULG vs. NHYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NULG Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is comparable to the NHYM Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NULG and NHYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NULGNHYMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.56

1.89

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

0.78

+0.12

Drawdowns

NULG vs. NHYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NULG drawdown since its inception was -36.17%, which is greater than NHYM's maximum drawdown of -6.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NULG and NHYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NULGNHYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.17%

-6.11%

-30.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.50%

-2.77%

-11.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.99%

0.00%

-0.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.84%

-1.73%

-5.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.26%

0.95%

+3.31%

Volatility

NULG vs. NHYM - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF (NULG) has a higher volatility of 4.80% compared to Nuveen High Yield Municipal Income ETF (NHYM) at 1.35%. This indicates that NULG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NHYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NULGNHYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.80%

1.35%

+3.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.55%

2.61%

+10.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.01%

4.39%

+12.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.51%

5.92%

+15.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.39%

5.92%

+15.47%

NULG vs. NHYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

NULG has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than NHYM's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

NULG vs. NHYM - Dividend Comparison

NULG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than NHYM's 4.52% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
NHYM
Nuveen High Yield Municipal Income ETF
4.52%4.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NULG
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.10%0.11%0.16%0.43%0.40%5.08%2.68%1.10%3.73%0.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


NULG and NHYM have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NULG has higher volatility (4.80%) compared to NHYM (1.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NULG dropped -36.17% vs NHYM's -6.11%.

On 1-year performance, NULG leads with 26.42% vs 8.17% for NHYM. On fees, NULG is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, NHYM has been the lower-risk option at 1.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NULG has performed better with a 26.42% return vs 8.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NULG is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for NHYM.

NHYM has the higher dividend yield at 4.52%, compared with 0.10% for NULG.

NULG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while NHYM is High Yield Muni. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for NULG and 0.35% for NHYM.

NHYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NULG and NHYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer