PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NULG vs. DVAL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NULG vs. DVAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF (NULG) and BrandywineGLOBAL Dynamic U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (DVAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NULG achieves a 16.76% return, which is significantly higher than DVAL's 7.60% return.


NULG

1D
-0.39%
1M
8.41%
YTD
16.76%
6M
15.85%
1Y
26.42%
3Y*
24.67%
5Y*
14.66%
10Y*

DVAL

1D
1.37%
1M
2.72%
YTD
7.60%
6M
8.41%
1Y
15.03%
3Y*
13.34%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NULG vs. DVAL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
NULG
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF
16.76%14.07%23.75%42.71%-0.45%
DVAL
BrandywineGLOBAL Dynamic U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
7.60%8.74%12.84%8.73%1.78%

Correlation

The correlation between NULG and DVAL is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2022

0.55

The correlation between NULG and DVAL shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.55 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

NULG vs. DVAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NULG
DVAL

Technology

56.5%
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

9.8%
10.2%

Industrials

9.4%
14.7%

Financial Services

7.1%
31.6%

Communication Services

6.5%
10.0%

Healthcare

5.5%
7.9%

Consumer Defensive

2.1%
6.6%

Basic Materials

1.9%
0.1%

Real Estate

1.2%

-

Energy

-

6.1%

Utilities

-

1.1%

Technology

NULG
56.5%
DVAL
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

NULG
9.8%
DVAL
10.2%

Industrials

NULG
9.4%
DVAL
14.7%

Financial Services

NULG
7.1%
DVAL
31.6%

Communication Services

NULG
6.5%
DVAL
10.0%

Healthcare

NULG
5.5%
DVAL
7.9%

Consumer Defensive

NULG
2.1%
DVAL
6.6%

Basic Materials

NULG
1.9%
DVAL
0.1%

Real Estate

NULG
1.2%
DVAL

-

Energy

NULG

-

DVAL
6.1%

Utilities

NULG

-

DVAL
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NULG vs. DVAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NULG
NULG Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
NULG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NULG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
NULG Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
NULG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
NULG Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

DVAL
DVAL Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
DVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
DVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
DVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
DVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NULG vs. DVAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF (NULG) and BrandywineGLOBAL Dynamic U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (DVAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NULGDVALDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.24

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

2.43

-0.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.22

7.80

-1.58

NULG vs. DVAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NULG Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is comparable to the DVAL Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NULG and DVAL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NULGDVALDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.56

1.42

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

0.79

+0.11

Drawdowns

NULG vs. DVAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NULG drawdown since its inception was -36.17%, which is greater than DVAL's maximum drawdown of -18.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NULG and DVAL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NULGDVALDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.17%

-18.11%

-18.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.50%

-6.20%

-8.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.28%

-18.11%

-4.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.99%

0.00%

-0.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.84%

-3.64%

-3.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.26%

1.93%

+2.33%

Volatility

NULG vs. DVAL - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF (NULG) has a higher volatility of 4.80% compared to BrandywineGLOBAL Dynamic U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (DVAL) at 3.02%. This indicates that NULG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DVAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NULGDVALDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.80%

3.02%

+1.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.55%

7.73%

+5.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.01%

10.64%

+6.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.51%

14.25%

+7.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.39%

14.25%

+7.14%

NULG vs. DVAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

NULG has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than DVAL's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

NULG vs. DVAL - Dividend Comparison

NULG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than DVAL's 1.86% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DVAL
BrandywineGLOBAL Dynamic U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
1.86%2.00%2.82%1.16%13.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NULG
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.10%0.11%0.16%0.43%0.40%5.08%2.68%1.10%3.73%0.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


NULG and DVAL have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NULG has higher volatility (4.80%) compared to DVAL (3.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NULG dropped -36.17% vs DVAL's -18.11%.

On 3-year performance, NULG leads with 24.67% vs 13.34% for DVAL. On fees, NULG is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, DVAL has been the lower-risk option at 3.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, NULG has performed better with a 24.67% return vs 13.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NULG is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for DVAL.

DVAL has the higher dividend yield at 1.86%, compared with 0.10% for NULG.

NULG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while DVAL is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Nuveen and BrandywineGLOBAL. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for NULG and 0.49% for DVAL.

NULG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NULG and DVAL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer