NUKX vs. OMAH

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

NUKX (Nicholas Nuclear Income ETF) and OMAH (VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NUKX charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for OMAH.

Performance

NUKX vs. OMAH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nicholas Nuclear Income ETF (NUKX) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

NUKX

• 1D: -4.10%
• 1M: -5.88%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OMAH

• 1D: 0.53%
• 1M: 2.66%
• 6M: 9.10%
• YTD: 9.21%
• 1Y: 13.01%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUKX vs. OMAH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
NUKX Nicholas Nuclear Income ETF	-20.21%
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	9.43%

Correlation

The correlation between NUKX and OMAH is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2026	0.14

NUKX vs. OMAH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NUKX	OMAH
Utilities	38.2%	-
Financial Services	16.9%	37.3%
Energy	16.2%	8.8%
Industrials	8.0%	4.9%
Consumer Cyclical	4.2%	4.1%
Consumer Defensive	4.1%	13.2%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	19.8%
Healthcare	-	4.4%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	11.6%

Return for Risk

NUKX vs. OMAH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUKX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

OMAH

OMAH Risk / Return Rank: 67
OMAH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
OMAH Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
OMAH Omega Ratio Rank: 57
OMAH Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
OMAH Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUKX vs. OMAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nicholas Nuclear Income ETF (NUKX) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NUKX	OMAH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.59	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.24	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.28	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	4.35	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	10.23	—

Drawdowns

NUKX vs. OMAH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUKX drawdown since its inception was -26.61%, which is greater than OMAH's maximum drawdown of -11.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUKX and OMAH.

Drawdown Indicators

	NUKX	OMAH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.61%	-11.83%	-14.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-3.00%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.61%	0.00%	-26.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.97%	-1.25%	-9.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.27%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NUKX	OMAH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.75%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	5.73%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	49.87%	8.21%	+41.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	49.87%	12.92%	+36.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	49.87%	12.92%	+36.95%

NUKX vs. OMAH - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUKX has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than OMAH's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

NUKX vs. OMAH - Dividend Comparison

NUKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.89%, less than OMAH's 14.94% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
NUKX Nicholas Nuclear Income ETF	5.89%	0.00%
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	14.94%	12.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NUKX and OMAH in my portfolio?

NUKX and OMAH have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NUKX or OMAH?

On fees, OMAH is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NUKX or OMAH?

OMAH is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for NUKX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NUKX or OMAH?

OMAH has the higher dividend yield at 14.94%, compared with 5.89% for NUKX.

What is the main difference between NUKX and OMAH?

They also come from different issuers: Nicholas Wealth and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for NUKX and 0.95% for OMAH.