NUKX vs. FFUT

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

NUKX (Nicholas Nuclear Income ETF) and FFUT (Fidelity Managed Futures ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NUKX is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Nicholas Wealth, while FFUT is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by Fidelity. Both are actively managed. Their -0.21 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. NUKX charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FFUT.

Performance

NUKX vs. FFUT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nicholas Nuclear Income ETF (NUKX) and Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

NUKX

• 1D: -0.97%
• 1M: -7.63%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

FFUT

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 5.46%
• 6M: 9.55%
• YTD: 13.58%
• 1Y: 23.75%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 19.94%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FFUT Fidelity Managed Futures ETF	$7.77M	$4.00M	$2.01M
NUKX Nicholas Nuclear Income ETF	$132.47K	$169.16K	$262.73K

NUKX vs. FFUT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
NUKX Nicholas Nuclear Income ETF	-22.51%
FFUT Fidelity Managed Futures ETF	7.88%

Correlation

The correlation between NUKX and FFUT is -0.21, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2026	-0.21

Return for Risk

NUKX vs. FFUT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NUKX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FFUT

FFUT Risk / Return Rank: 88
FFUT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
FFUT Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
FFUT Omega Ratio Rank: 87
FFUT Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
FFUT Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NUKX vs. FFUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nicholas Nuclear Income ETF (NUKX) and Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NUKX	FFUT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.02	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.85	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.38	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	4.20	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	14.36	—

Drawdowns

NUKX vs. FFUT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUKX drawdown since its inception was -31.95%, which is greater than FFUT's maximum drawdown of -5.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUKX and FFUT.

Drawdown Indicators

	NUKX	FFUT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.95%	-5.59%	-26.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-5.59%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-28.73%	-1.43%	-27.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.27%	-1.11%	-12.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.63%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NUKX	FFUT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.61%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.27%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	49.22%	11.67%	+37.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	49.22%	11.09%	+38.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	49.22%	11.09%	+38.13%

NUKX vs. FFUT - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUKX has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than FFUT's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

NUKX vs. FFUT - Dividend Comparison

NUKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.83%, more than FFUT's 1.84% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
FFUT Fidelity Managed Futures ETF	1.84%	2.09%
NUKX Nicholas Nuclear Income ETF	6.83%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NUKX and FFUT in my portfolio?

NUKX and FFUT have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NUKX or FFUT?

On fees, FFUT is cheaper at 0.80% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NUKX or FFUT?

FFUT is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for NUKX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NUKX or FFUT?

NUKX has the higher dividend yield at 6.83%, compared with 1.84% for FFUT.

What is the main difference between NUKX and FFUT?

NUKX is categorized as Derivative Income, while FFUT is Systematic Trend. They also come from different issuers: Nicholas Wealth and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for NUKX and 0.80% for FFUT.