PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NUKX vs. DBO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NUKX vs. DBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nicholas Nuclear Income ETF (NUKX) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


NUKX

1D
5.13%
1M
-2.86%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DBO

1D
1.05%
1M
-0.09%
YTD
80.66%
6M
78.46%
1Y
78.18%
3Y*
20.95%
5Y*
15.57%
10Y*
11.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUKX vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NUKX and DBO is -0.39, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2026

-0.39

NUKX vs. DBO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NUKX
DBO

Utilities

39.6%

-

Energy

21.7%

-

Financial Services

12.6%
116.0%

Industrials

9.7%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

NUKX
39.6%
DBO

-

Energy

NUKX
21.7%
DBO

-

Financial Services

NUKX
12.6%
DBO
116.0%

Industrials

NUKX
9.7%
DBO

-

Basic Materials

NUKX

-

DBO

-

Communication Services

NUKX

-

DBO

-

Consumer Cyclical

NUKX

-

DBO

-

Consumer Defensive

NUKX

-

DBO

-

Healthcare

NUKX

-

DBO

-

Real Estate

NUKX

-

DBO

-

Technology

NUKX

-

DBO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NUKX vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUKX

DBO
DBO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
DBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
DBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBO Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUKX vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nicholas Nuclear Income ETF (NUKX) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

NUKX vs. DBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NUKXDBODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.06

0.02

+0.04

Drawdowns

NUKX vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUKX drawdown since its inception was -18.73%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUKX and DBO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NUKXDBODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.73%

-90.18%

+71.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.37%

-52.46%

+45.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.96%

-62.25%

+55.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.92%

Volatility

NUKX vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NUKXDBODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.06%

34.54%

+14.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.06%

32.28%

+16.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.06%

31.78%

+17.28%

NUKX vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUKX has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

NUKX vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison

NUKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.62%, more than DBO's 1.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
1.94%3.51%4.68%4.59%0.66%0.00%0.00%1.63%1.58%
NUKX
Nicholas Nuclear Income ETF
3.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NUKX and DBO have a correlation of -0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DBO is cheaper at 0.78% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DBO is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for NUKX.

NUKX has the higher dividend yield at 3.62%, compared with 1.94% for DBO.

NUKX is categorized as Derivative Income, while DBO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Nicholas Wealth and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for NUKX and 0.78% for DBO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NUKX and DBO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer