NUKX vs. DBO
NUKX (Nicholas Nuclear Income ETF) and DBO (Invesco DB Oil Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - NUKX is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Nicholas Wealth, while DBO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. NUKX is actively managed, while DBO is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.34, they often move in opposite directions. NUKX charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBO.
Performance
NUKX vs. DBO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NUKX
- 1D
- -2.93%
- 1M
- -5.31%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DBO
- 1D
- -1.13%
- 1M
- -18.58%
- YTD
- 50.16%
- 6M
- 47.74%
- 1Y
- 36.30%
- 3Y*
- 14.32%
- 5Y*
- 10.16%
- 10Y*
- 9.22%
NUKX vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
NUKX Nicholas Nuclear Income ETF | -11.18% |
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 18.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between NUKX and DBO is -0.34, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2026 | -0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NUKX vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank
NUKX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DBO
NUKX vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nicholas Nuclear Income ETF (NUKX) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NUKX | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.19 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.58 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.29 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NUKX vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NUKX drawdown since its inception was -26.54%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUKX and DBO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NUKX | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.54% | -90.18% | +63.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -23.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -28.20% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.31% | -60.48% | +42.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.98% | -62.22% | +53.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 8.51% | — |
Volatility
NUKX vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NUKX | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.29% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 29.36% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.36% | 34.89% | +17.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.36% | 32.54% | +19.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.36% | 31.81% | +20.55% |
NUKX vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison
NUKX has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
NUKX vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison
NUKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.59%, more than DBO's 2.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 2.34% | 3.51% | 4.68% | 4.59% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.63% | 1.58% |
NUKX Nicholas Nuclear Income ETF | 4.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NUKX and DBO have a correlation of -0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DBO is cheaper at 0.78% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DBO is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for NUKX.
NUKX has the higher dividend yield at 4.59%, compared with 2.34% for DBO.
NUKX is categorized as Derivative Income, while DBO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Nicholas Wealth and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for NUKX and 0.78% for DBO.
Find the right allocation for NUKX and DBO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer