PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NUHY vs. NULV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NUHY vs. NULV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen ESG High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (NUHY) and Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF (NULV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUHY achieves a 1.49% return, which is significantly lower than NULV's 13.87% return.


NUHY

1D
0.14%
1M
0.75%
YTD
1.49%
6M
1.82%
1Y
6.51%
3Y*
8.51%
5Y*
3.43%
10Y*

NULV

1D
0.92%
1M
2.54%
YTD
13.87%
6M
14.07%
1Y
28.31%
3Y*
17.85%
5Y*
8.68%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUHY vs. NULV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
NUHY
Nuveen ESG High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.49%9.12%7.26%11.18%-11.80%2.46%4.14%2.21%
NULV
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF
13.87%16.31%11.88%7.60%-10.09%23.46%1.87%6.95%

Correlation

The correlation between NUHY and NULV is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019

0.63

The correlation between NUHY and NULV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NUHY vs. NULV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUHY
NUHY Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
NUHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUHY Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
NUHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUHY Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

NULV
NULV Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
NULV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NULV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
NULV Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
NULV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
NULV Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUHY vs. NULV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (NUHY) and Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF (NULV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NUHYNULVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.48

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.28

3.91

-1.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.16

16.42

-6.26

NUHY vs. NULV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUHY Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is lower than the NULV Sharpe Ratio of 2.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUHY and NULV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NUHYNULVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.72

2.66

-0.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.61

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.61

-0.18

Drawdowns

NUHY vs. NULV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUHY drawdown since its inception was -20.14%, smaller than the maximum NULV drawdown of -36.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUHY and NULV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NUHYNULVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.14%

-36.99%

+16.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.87%

-7.28%

+4.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.68%

-15.07%

+10.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.92%

-21.47%

+4.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

0.00%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.53%

-4.97%

+1.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.64%

1.73%

-1.09%

Volatility

NUHY vs. NULV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen ESG High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (NUHY) is 1.35%, while Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF (NULV) has a volatility of 2.52%. This indicates that NUHY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NULV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NUHYNULVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.35%

2.52%

-1.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.04%

7.98%

-4.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.82%

10.68%

-6.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.31%

14.33%

-7.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.51%

17.02%

-8.51%

NUHY vs. NULV - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUHY has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than NULV's 0.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

NUHY vs. NULV - Dividend Comparison

NUHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.63%, more than NULV's 1.44% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
NUHY
Nuveen ESG High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
6.63%6.51%6.59%6.64%6.36%4.88%5.10%1.37%0.00%0.00%
NULV
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF
1.44%1.64%2.09%2.55%2.12%4.52%1.42%1.47%3.73%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


NUHY and NULV have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NULV has higher volatility (2.52%) compared to NUHY (1.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUHY dropped -20.14% vs NULV's -36.99%.

On 5-year performance, NULV leads with 8.68% vs 3.43% for NUHY. On fees, NULV is cheaper at 0.26% per year. On volatility, NUHY has been the lower-risk option at 1.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, NULV has performed better with a 8.68% return vs 3.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NULV is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for NUHY.

NUHY has the higher dividend yield at 6.63%, compared with 1.44% for NULV.

NUHY is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while NULV is Large Cap Value Equities. NUHY tracks Bloomberg Barclays MSCI US Aggregate ESG Select Index, while NULV tracks MSCI TIAA ESG USA Large Cap Value. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for NUHY and 0.26% for NULV.

NULV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NUHY and NULV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer