PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NUHY vs. BSJP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NUHY vs. BSJP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen ESG High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (NUHY) and Invesco BulletShares 2025 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


NUHY

1D
0.14%
1M
0.75%
YTD
1.49%
6M
1.82%
1Y
6.51%
3Y*
8.51%
5Y*
3.43%
10Y*

BSJP

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUHY vs. BSJP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
NUHY
Nuveen ESG High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.49%9.12%7.26%11.18%-11.80%2.46%4.14%2.21%
BSJP
Invesco BulletShares 2025 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
0.00%4.46%8.07%10.41%-5.16%4.57%4.16%2.40%

Correlation

The correlation between NUHY and BSJP is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019

0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between NUHY and BSJP has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NUHY vs. BSJP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUHY
NUHY Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
NUHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUHY Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
NUHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUHY Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

BSJP
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUHY vs. BSJP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (NUHY) and Invesco BulletShares 2025 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NUHYBSJPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.16

NUHY vs. BSJP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NUHYBSJPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

Drawdowns

NUHY vs. BSJP - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NUHYBSJPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.64%

Volatility

NUHY vs. BSJP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NUHYBSJPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.51%

NUHY vs. BSJP - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUHY has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than BSJP's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

NUHY vs. BSJP - Dividend Comparison

NUHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.63%, more than BSJP's 2.26% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BSJP
Invesco BulletShares 2025 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
2.26%4.50%6.25%7.07%5.37%4.27%4.96%5.49%5.84%1.32%
NUHY
Nuveen ESG High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
6.63%6.51%6.59%6.64%6.36%4.88%5.10%1.37%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NUHY and BSJP have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NUHY is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NUHY is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for BSJP.

NUHY has the higher dividend yield at 6.63%, compared with 2.26% for BSJP.

NUHY tracks Bloomberg Barclays MSCI US Aggregate ESG Select Index, while BSJP tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2025 TR Index. They also come from different issuers: Nuveen and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for NUHY and 0.42% for BSJP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NUHY and BSJP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer