NUGT vs. EURL
NUGT (Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull 2X Shares) and EURL (Direxion Daily FTSE Europe Bull 3x Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion - NUGT tracks the NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index (300%) while EURL tracks the FTSE Developed Europe Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, NUGT returned -9.77%/yr vs 11.27%/yr for EURL. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NUGT charges 1.23%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for EURL.
Performance
NUGT vs. EURL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NUGT achieves a -27.03% return, which is significantly lower than EURL's 13.73% return. Over the past 10 years, NUGT has underperformed EURL with an annualized return of -9.77%, while EURL has yielded a comparatively higher 11.27% annualized return.
NUGT
- 1D
- 5.72%
- 1M
- -18.48%
- YTD
- -27.03%
- 6M
- -26.67%
- 1Y
- 63.65%
- 3Y*
- 55.24%
- 5Y*
- 13.62%
- 10Y*
- -9.77%
EURL
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 12.42%
- YTD
- 13.73%
- 6M
- 19.84%
- 1Y
- 43.44%
- 3Y*
- 31.61%
- 5Y*
- 5.43%
- 10Y*
- 11.27%
NUGT vs. EURL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NUGT Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull 2X Shares | -27.03% | 425.05% | 2.89% | 2.60% | -32.10% | -26.31% | -60.16% | 100.73% | -44.52% | 3.73% |
EURL Direxion Daily FTSE Europe Bull 3x Shares | 13.73% | 105.85% | -11.42% | 44.19% | -54.41% | 46.59% | -23.19% | 72.61% | -46.39% | 91.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between NUGT and EURL is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2014 | 0.26 |
The correlation between NUGT and EURL shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (all time) to 0.44 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
NUGT vs. EURL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NUGT
EURL
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
NUGT
EURL
Communication Services
NUGT
-
EURL
Consumer Cyclical
NUGT
-
EURL
Consumer Defensive
NUGT
-
EURL
Energy
NUGT
-
EURL
Financial Services
NUGT
-
EURL
Healthcare
NUGT
-
EURL
Industrials
NUGT
-
EURL
Real Estate
NUGT
-
EURL
Technology
NUGT
-
EURL
Utilities
NUGT
-
EURL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NUGT vs. EURL — Risk / Return Rank
NUGT
EURL
NUGT vs. EURL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull 2X Shares (NUGT) and Direxion Daily FTSE Europe Bull 3x Shares (EURL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NUGT | EURL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.16 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.10 | 1.11 | -0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.75 | 3.50 | -0.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NUGT vs. EURL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NUGT drawdown since its inception was -99.97%, which is greater than EURL's maximum drawdown of -84.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUGT and EURL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NUGT | EURL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.97% | -84.65% | -15.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -63.43% | -33.05% | -30.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.43% | -38.81% | -24.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.72% | -75.24% | +1.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -96.91% | -84.65% | -12.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.83% | -8.76% | -91.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -91.52% | -36.91% | -54.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.30% | 10.56% | +14.74% |
Volatility
NUGT vs. EURL - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull 2X Shares (NUGT) has a higher volatility of 34.50% compared to Direxion Daily FTSE Europe Bull 3x Shares (EURL) at 17.98%. This indicates that NUGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EURL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NUGT | EURL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 34.50% | 17.98% | +16.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 78.60% | 40.51% | +38.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 92.79% | 48.09% | +44.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.64% | 53.55% | +19.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 88.12% | 55.82% | +32.30% |
NUGT vs. EURL - Expense Ratio Comparison
NUGT has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is higher than EURL's 1.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
NUGT vs. EURL - Dividend Comparison
NUGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, less than EURL's 1.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EURL Direxion Daily FTSE Europe Bull 3x Shares | 1.37% | 1.50% | 3.51% | 2.50% | 1.80% | 0.33% | 0.41% | 1.17% | 3.07% | 0.38% |
NUGT Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull 2X Shares | 0.41% | 0.22% | 1.79% | 1.67% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.63% | 0.57% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NUGT and EURL have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NUGT has higher volatility (34.50%) compared to EURL (17.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUGT dropped -99.97% vs EURL's -84.65%.
On 10-year performance, EURL leads with 11.27% vs -9.77% for NUGT. On fees, EURL is cheaper at 1.07% per year. On volatility, EURL has been the lower-risk option at 17.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EURL has performed better with a 11.27% return vs -9.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EURL is cheaper with a 1.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.23% for NUGT.
EURL has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 0.41% for NUGT.
NUGT tracks NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index (300%), while EURL tracks FTSE Developed Europe Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 1.23% for NUGT and 1.07% for EURL.
EURL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.77 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NUGT and EURL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer