PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NUGIX vs. GCCHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NUGIX vs. GCCHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Global Dividend Growth Fund (NUGIX) and GMO Climate Change Fund (GCCHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUGIX achieves a 5.11% return, which is significantly lower than GCCHX's 28.83% return.


NUGIX

1D
0.59%
1M
3.86%
YTD
5.11%
6M
5.64%
1Y
13.12%
3Y*
13.64%
5Y*
8.62%
10Y*
9.51%

GCCHX

1D
1.60%
1M
7.08%
YTD
28.83%
6M
29.87%
1Y
82.70%
3Y*
6.19%
5Y*
4.04%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUGIX vs. GCCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NUGIX
Nuveen Global Dividend Growth Fund
5.11%11.76%15.34%14.49%-9.86%19.98%4.02%28.15%-9.00%14.19%
GCCHX
GMO Climate Change Fund
28.83%39.25%-25.63%-6.85%-10.39%21.84%42.82%27.36%-16.35%26.15%

Correlation

The correlation between NUGIX and GCCHX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2017

0.71

The correlation between NUGIX and GCCHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NUGIX vs. GCCHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUGIX
NUGIX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
NUGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
NUGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

GCCHX
GCCHX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
GCCHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCCHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCCHX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
GCCHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCCHX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUGIX vs. GCCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Global Dividend Growth Fund (NUGIX) and GMO Climate Change Fund (GCCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NUGIXGCCHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.57

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.56

7.41

-5.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.57

24.13

-18.56

NUGIX vs. GCCHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUGIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is lower than the GCCHX Sharpe Ratio of 3.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUGIX and GCCHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NUGIXGCCHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.26

3.70

-2.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

0.15

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.44

+0.22

Drawdowns

NUGIX vs. GCCHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUGIX drawdown since its inception was -33.65%, smaller than the maximum GCCHX drawdown of -54.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUGIX and GCCHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NUGIXGCCHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.65%

-54.32%

+20.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.59%

-11.76%

+3.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.32%

-52.03%

+36.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.20%

-54.32%

+33.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.56%

-13.91%

+10.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.40%

3.61%

-1.21%

Volatility

NUGIX vs. GCCHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen Global Dividend Growth Fund (NUGIX) is 2.66%, while GMO Climate Change Fund (GCCHX) has a volatility of 6.47%. This indicates that NUGIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GCCHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NUGIXGCCHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.66%

6.47%

-3.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.14%

16.31%

-8.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.70%

23.57%

-12.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.78%

26.95%

-13.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.49%

25.15%

-9.66%

NUGIX vs. GCCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUGIX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than GCCHX's 0.77% expense ratio.


Dividends

NUGIX vs. GCCHX - Dividend Comparison

NUGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.14%, more than GCCHX's 1.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GCCHX
GMO Climate Change Fund
1.17%1.51%0.66%0.96%2.24%25.43%5.42%4.03%2.62%3.43%0.00%0.00%
NUGIX
Nuveen Global Dividend Growth Fund
11.14%11.74%7.84%1.53%4.27%7.70%1.86%3.76%4.98%15.70%2.02%1.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


NUGIX and GCCHX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GCCHX has higher volatility (6.47%) compared to NUGIX (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUGIX dropped -33.65% vs GCCHX's -54.32%.

GCCHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.70 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NUGIX and GCCHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer