NUGIX vs. CSUAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Nuveen Global Dividend Growth Fund (NUGIX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX).
NUGIX is managed by Nuveen. It was launched on Jun 10, 2012. CSUAX is a passively managed fund by Cohen & Steers that tracks the performance of the FTSE Global Core Infrastructure 50/50 Index. It was launched on Aug 28, 2017.
Performance
NUGIX vs. CSUAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NUGIX vs. CSUAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NUGIX Nuveen Global Dividend Growth Fund | -4.45% | 11.76% | 15.34% | 14.49% | -9.86% | 19.98% | 4.02% | 28.15% | -9.00% | 19.91% |
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 8.35% | 14.30% | 8.30% | 2.09% | -5.20% | 16.24% | -1.65% | 24.26% | -5.83% | 17.99% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NUGIX achieves a -4.45% return, which is significantly lower than CSUAX's 8.35% return. Over the past 10 years, NUGIX has outperformed CSUAX with an annualized return of 8.86%, while CSUAX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.48% annualized return.
NUGIX
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -8.36%
- YTD
- -4.45%
- 6M
- -2.71%
- 1Y
- 8.75%
- 3Y*
- 10.88%
- 5Y*
- 7.69%
- 10Y*
- 8.86%
CSUAX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -4.38%
- YTD
- 8.35%
- 6M
- 8.97%
- 1Y
- 17.98%
- 3Y*
- 10.78%
- 5Y*
- 7.79%
- 10Y*
- 7.48%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NUGIX vs. CSUAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NUGIX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than CSUAX's 1.22% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NUGIX vs. CSUAX — Risk / Return Rank
NUGIX
CSUAX
NUGIX vs. CSUAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Global Dividend Growth Fund (NUGIX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NUGIX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.61 | 1.63 | -1.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.96 | 2.17 | -1.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.32 | -0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.74 | 2.36 | -1.62 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.21 | 10.32 | -7.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NUGIX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 | 1.63 | -1.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | 0.61 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.50 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.55 | +0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between NUGIX and CSUAX is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
NUGIX vs. CSUAX - Dividend Comparison
NUGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.98%, more than CSUAX's 7.46% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NUGIX Nuveen Global Dividend Growth Fund | 11.98% | 11.74% | 7.84% | 1.53% | 4.27% | 7.70% | 1.86% | 3.76% | 4.98% | 15.70% | 2.02% | 1.95% |
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 7.46% | 8.09% | 2.23% | 2.17% | 3.55% | 2.95% | 1.30% | 1.52% | 2.08% | 5.00% | 2.04% | 6.20% |
Drawdowns
NUGIX vs. CSUAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NUGIX drawdown since its inception was -33.65%, smaller than the maximum CSUAX drawdown of -52.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUGIX and CSUAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NUGIX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.65% | -52.20% | +18.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.80% | -7.98% | -2.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.20% | -20.45% | -0.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.65% | -35.05% | +1.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.57% | -4.38% | -4.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.57% | -8.49% | +4.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.49% | 1.83% | +0.66% |
Volatility
NUGIX vs. CSUAX - Volatility Comparison
Nuveen Global Dividend Growth Fund (NUGIX) has a higher volatility of 4.16% compared to Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) at 3.26%. This indicates that NUGIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSUAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NUGIX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.16% | 3.26% | +0.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.10% | 6.89% | +1.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.01% | 11.48% | +3.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.75% | 12.89% | +0.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.48% | 14.89% | +0.59% |