NUG vs. SPUU
NUG (Leverage Shares 2X Long NU Daily ETF) and SPUU (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. NUG is actively managed, while SPUU is passively managed. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NUG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for SPUU.
Performance
NUG vs. SPUU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NUG achieves a -42.23% return, which is significantly lower than SPUU's 19.67% return.
NUG
- 1D
- 1.74%
- 1M
- 26.30%
- 6M
- -46.73%
- YTD
- -42.23%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPUU
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 3.56%
- 6M
- 15.49%
- YTD
- 19.67%
- 1Y
- 40.22%
- 3Y*
- 35.03%
- 5Y*
- 18.61%
- 10Y*
- 24.16%
NUG vs. SPUU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NUG Leverage Shares 2X Long NU Daily ETF | -42.23% | 9.30% |
SPUU Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF | 19.67% | 2.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between NUG and SPUU is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | 0.57 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NUG vs. SPUU — Risk / Return Rank
NUG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SPUU
NUG vs. SPUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long NU Daily ETF (NUG) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NUG | SPUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.27 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.17 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.99 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NUG vs. SPUU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NUG drawdown since its inception was -66.15%, which is greater than SPUU's maximum drawdown of -59.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUG and SPUU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NUG | SPUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.15% | -59.35% | -6.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -18.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -35.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -46.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -53.26% | -1.40% | -51.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.78% | -9.46% | -24.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.38% | — |
Volatility
NUG vs. SPUU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NUG | SPUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.62% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 20.06% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 79.71% | 25.21% | +54.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 79.71% | 33.67% | +46.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 79.71% | 35.74% | +43.97% |
NUG vs. SPUU - Expense Ratio Comparison
NUG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SPUU's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
NUG vs. SPUU - Dividend Comparison
NUG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPUU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NUG Leverage Shares 2X Long NU Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPUU Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF | 1.31% | 1.63% | 0.55% | 0.83% | 0.88% | 3.04% | 8.03% | 1.80% | 5.50% | 6.96% | 8.08% | 4.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NUG and SPUU have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPUU is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPUU is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for NUG.
SPUU has the higher dividend yield at 1.31%, compared with 0.00% for NUG.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for NUG and 0.60% for SPUU.
Find the right allocation for NUG and SPUU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer