PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NUG vs. LINT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NUG vs. LINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long NU Daily ETF (NUG) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUG achieves a -49.34% return, which is significantly lower than LINT's 869.59% return.


NUG

1D
1.13%
1M
-1.26%
YTD
-49.34%
6M
-48.76%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LINT

1D
10.62%
1M
28.51%
YTD
869.59%
6M
899.07%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUG vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NUG and LINT is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025

0.26

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NUG vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long NU Daily ETF (NUG) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

NUG vs. LINT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NUG vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUG drawdown since its inception was -66.15%, which is greater than LINT's maximum drawdown of -49.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUG and LINT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NUGLINTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.15%

-49.54%

-16.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-59.01%

0.00%

-59.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.80%

-20.53%

-11.27%

Volatility

NUG vs. LINT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NUGLINTDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

79.90%

168.26%

-88.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

79.90%

168.26%

-88.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

79.90%

168.26%

-88.36%

NUG vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

NUG vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison

NUG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NUG and LINT have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NUG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NUG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for LINT.

LINT has the higher dividend yield at 0.09%, compared with 0.00% for NUG.

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for NUG and 0.97% for LINT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NUG and LINT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer