PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NUDV vs. NUAG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NUDV vs. NUAG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF (NUDV) and Nuveen Enhanced Yield U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUAG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NUDV vs. NUAG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
NUDV
Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF
3.94%10.77%14.02%10.13%-7.83%8.92%
NUAG
Nuveen Enhanced Yield U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
-0.03%7.37%2.02%7.52%-13.97%-0.04%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUDV achieves a 3.94% return, which is significantly higher than NUAG's -0.03% return.


NUDV

1D
0.20%
1M
-4.71%
YTD
3.94%
6M
7.48%
1Y
13.48%
3Y*
13.06%
5Y*
10Y*

NUAG

1D
0.03%
1M
-1.41%
YTD
-0.03%
6M
0.67%
1Y
4.34%
3Y*
4.46%
5Y*
0.54%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NUDV vs. NUAG - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUDV has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is higher than NUAG's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

NUDV vs. NUAG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUDV
NUDV Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
NUDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUDV Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
NUDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUDV Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

NUAG
NUAG Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
NUAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUAG Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
NUAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUAG Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUDV vs. NUAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF (NUDV) and Nuveen Enhanced Yield U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NUDVNUAGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.89

1.02

-0.13

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.33

1.45

-0.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.19

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.12

1.90

-0.78

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.97

5.51

-0.54

NUDV vs. NUAG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUDV Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is comparable to the NUAG Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUDV and NUAG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NUDVNUAGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

1.02

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.30

+0.27

Correlation

The correlation between NUDV and NUAG is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

NUDV vs. NUAG - Dividend Comparison

NUDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%, less than NUAG's 4.54% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
NUDV
Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF
2.40%2.36%6.18%2.48%2.96%0.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NUAG
Nuveen Enhanced Yield U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
4.54%4.43%4.44%3.95%3.60%2.27%2.93%3.54%3.79%3.38%0.48%

Drawdowns

NUDV vs. NUAG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUDV drawdown since its inception was -20.10%, roughly equal to the maximum NUAG drawdown of -19.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUDV and NUAG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NUDVNUAGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.10%

-19.79%

-0.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.81%

-2.54%

-9.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.85%

-1.75%

-3.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.05%

-5.01%

-0.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.65%

0.88%

+1.77%

Volatility

NUDV vs. NUAG - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF (NUDV) has a higher volatility of 3.58% compared to Nuveen Enhanced Yield U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUAG) at 1.66%. This indicates that NUDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NUAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NUDVNUAGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.58%

1.66%

+1.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.63%

2.44%

+5.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.14%

4.28%

+10.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.12%

6.00%

+9.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.12%

5.51%

+9.61%