PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NUDV vs. NPFI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NUDV vs. NPFI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF (NUDV) and Nuveen Preferred And Income ETF (NPFI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUDV achieves a 9.63% return, which is significantly higher than NPFI's 1.62% return.


NUDV

1D
-0.72%
1M
1.42%
YTD
9.63%
6M
10.03%
1Y
18.63%
3Y*
15.87%
5Y*
10Y*

NPFI

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.76%
YTD
1.62%
6M
2.06%
1Y
7.90%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUDV vs. NPFI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
NUDV
Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF
9.63%10.77%10.54%
NPFI
Nuveen Preferred And Income ETF
1.62%9.21%6.56%

Correlation

The correlation between NUDV and NPFI is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024

0.48

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NUDV vs. NPFI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUDV
NUDV Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
NUDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUDV Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
NUDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUDV Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

NPFI
NPFI Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
NPFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NPFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
NPFI Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
NPFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
NPFI Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUDV vs. NPFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF (NUDV) and Nuveen Preferred And Income ETF (NPFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NUDVNPFIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.81

2.72

-0.91

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.66

4.18

-1.53

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.64

-0.32

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.84

2.49

+0.34

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.08

12.02

-1.95

NUDV vs. NPFI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUDV Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is lower than the NPFI Sharpe Ratio of 2.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUDV and NPFI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NUDVNPFIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.81

2.72

-0.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

2.65

-2.01

Drawdowns

NUDV vs. NPFI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUDV drawdown since its inception was -20.10%, which is greater than NPFI's maximum drawdown of -3.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUDV and NPFI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NUDVNPFIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.10%

-3.18%

-16.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.60%

-3.18%

-3.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.72%

-0.11%

-0.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.92%

-0.34%

-4.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.85%

0.66%

+1.19%

Volatility

NUDV vs. NPFI - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF (NUDV) has a higher volatility of 2.71% compared to Nuveen Preferred And Income ETF (NPFI) at 0.83%. This indicates that NUDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NPFI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NUDVNPFIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.71%

0.83%

+1.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.44%

2.53%

+4.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.34%

2.91%

+7.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.97%

2.95%

+12.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.97%

2.95%

+12.02%

NUDV vs. NPFI - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUDV has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is lower than NPFI's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

NUDV vs. NPFI - Dividend Comparison

NUDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, less than NPFI's 6.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
NPFI
Nuveen Preferred And Income ETF
6.41%6.33%5.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NUDV
Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF
2.27%2.36%6.18%2.48%2.96%0.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


NUDV and NPFI have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NUDV has higher volatility (2.71%) compared to NPFI (0.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUDV dropped -20.10% vs NPFI's -3.18%.

On 1-year performance, NUDV leads with 18.63% vs 7.90% for NPFI. On fees, NUDV is cheaper at 0.26% per year. On volatility, NPFI has been the lower-risk option at 0.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NUDV has performed better with a 18.63% return vs 7.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NUDV is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for NPFI.

NPFI has the higher dividend yield at 6.41%, compared with 2.27% for NUDV.

NUDV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while NPFI is Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for NUDV and 0.55% for NPFI.

NPFI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NUDV and NPFI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer