PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NUDV vs. FNDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NUDV vs. FNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF (NUDV) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUDV achieves a 9.63% return, which is significantly lower than FNDX's 14.57% return.


NUDV

1D
-0.72%
1M
1.42%
YTD
9.63%
6M
10.03%
1Y
18.63%
3Y*
15.87%
5Y*
10Y*

FNDX

1D
-0.13%
1M
3.88%
YTD
14.57%
6M
14.58%
1Y
32.32%
3Y*
20.90%
5Y*
12.82%
10Y*
14.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUDV vs. FNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
NUDV
Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF
9.63%10.77%14.02%10.13%-7.83%8.92%
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF
14.57%16.94%16.77%18.23%-6.92%7.74%

Correlation

The correlation between NUDV and FNDX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2021

0.93

The correlation between NUDV and FNDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

NUDV vs. FNDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NUDV
FNDX

Financial Services

23.2%
14.1%

Technology

13.2%
19.1%

Industrials

12.0%
9.3%

Healthcare

11.3%
12.0%

Consumer Defensive

10.5%
7.4%

Consumer Cyclical

6.7%
9.2%

Real Estate

5.8%
1.8%

Utilities

5.8%
3.2%

Energy

5.0%
10.3%

Communication Services

3.9%
10.1%

Basic Materials

2.7%
3.7%

Financial Services

NUDV
23.2%
FNDX
14.1%

Technology

NUDV
13.2%
FNDX
19.1%

Industrials

NUDV
12.0%
FNDX
9.3%

Healthcare

NUDV
11.3%
FNDX
12.0%

Consumer Defensive

NUDV
10.5%
FNDX
7.4%

Consumer Cyclical

NUDV
6.7%
FNDX
9.2%

Real Estate

NUDV
5.8%
FNDX
1.8%

Utilities

NUDV
5.8%
FNDX
3.2%

Energy

NUDV
5.0%
FNDX
10.3%

Communication Services

NUDV
3.9%
FNDX
10.1%

Basic Materials

NUDV
2.7%
FNDX
3.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NUDV vs. FNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUDV
NUDV Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
NUDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUDV Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
NUDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUDV Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

FNDX
FNDX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
FNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUDV vs. FNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF (NUDV) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NUDVFNDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.81

3.18

-1.37

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.66

4.47

-1.81

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.59

-0.27

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.84

5.35

-2.52

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.08

20.97

-10.89

NUDV vs. FNDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUDV Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is lower than the FNDX Sharpe Ratio of 3.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUDV and FNDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NUDVFNDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.81

3.18

-1.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.79

-0.15

Drawdowns

NUDV vs. FNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUDV drawdown since its inception was -20.10%, smaller than the maximum FNDX drawdown of -37.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUDV and FNDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NUDVFNDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.10%

-37.72%

+17.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.60%

-6.06%

-0.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.48%

-16.30%

-0.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.72%

-0.13%

-0.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.92%

-3.55%

-1.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.85%

1.55%

+0.30%

Volatility

NUDV vs. FNDX - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF (NUDV) has a higher volatility of 2.71% compared to Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) at 2.25%. This indicates that NUDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NUDVFNDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.71%

2.25%

+0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.44%

7.25%

+0.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.34%

10.22%

+0.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.97%

15.18%

-0.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.97%

17.50%

-2.53%

NUDV vs. FNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUDV has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDX's 0.25% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

NUDV vs. FNDX - Dividend Comparison

NUDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, more than FNDX's 1.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF
1.45%1.63%1.76%1.82%2.07%1.64%2.29%2.23%2.40%1.86%2.01%2.01%
NUDV
Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF
2.27%2.36%6.18%2.48%2.96%0.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NUDV and FNDX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NUDV has higher volatility (2.71%) compared to FNDX (2.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUDV dropped -20.10% vs FNDX's -37.72%.

On 3-year performance, FNDX leads with 20.90% vs 15.87% for NUDV. On fees, FNDX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FNDX has been the lower-risk option at 2.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, FNDX has performed better with a 20.90% return vs 15.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FNDX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.26% for NUDV.

NUDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.27%, compared with 1.45% for FNDX.

NUDV tracks Nuveen ESG USA High Dividend Yield Index, while FNDX tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index. They also come from different issuers: Nuveen and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for NUDV and 0.25% for FNDX.

FNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.18 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NUDV and FNDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer