NUDM vs. NURE
NUDM (Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF) and NURE (Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NUDM is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI TIAA ESG International DM, while NURE is a REIT fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Short-Term REIT Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NUDM returned 7.98%/yr vs 1.55%/yr for NURE. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NUDM charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NURE.
Performance
NUDM vs. NURE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NUDM achieves a 7.90% return, which is significantly lower than NURE's 11.00% return.
NUDM
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- 4.14%
- YTD
- 7.90%
- 6M
- 9.70%
- 1Y
- 21.49%
- 3Y*
- 16.01%
- 5Y*
- 7.98%
- 10Y*
- —
NURE
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- 4.16%
- YTD
- 11.00%
- 6M
- 11.80%
- 1Y
- 7.38%
- 3Y*
- 4.66%
- 5Y*
- 1.55%
- 10Y*
- —
NUDM vs. NURE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NUDM Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF | 7.90% | 29.60% | 5.47% | 17.70% | -15.16% | 10.62% | 10.06% | 24.58% | -14.82% | 8.40% |
NURE Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF | 11.00% | -7.51% | 6.65% | 13.09% | -28.48% | 53.41% | -7.24% | 25.10% | 0.02% | 2.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between NUDM and NURE is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2017 | 0.47 |
The correlation between NUDM and NURE shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.52 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
NUDM vs. NURE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NUDM
NURE
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
Energy
-
Financial Services
NUDM
NURE
-
Industrials
NUDM
NURE
-
Technology
NUDM
NURE
-
Healthcare
NUDM
NURE
-
Consumer Defensive
NUDM
NURE
-
Consumer Cyclical
NUDM
NURE
-
Basic Materials
NUDM
NURE
-
Communication Services
NUDM
NURE
-
Utilities
NUDM
NURE
-
Real Estate
NUDM
NURE
Energy
NUDM
NURE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NUDM vs. NURE — Risk / Return Rank
NUDM
NURE
NUDM vs. NURE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF (NUDM) and Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF (NURE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NUDM | NURE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.37 | 0.47 | +0.90 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.96 | 0.78 | +1.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.09 | +0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.73 | 0.81 | +0.92 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.46 | 1.68 | +4.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NUDM | NURE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.37 | 0.47 | +0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.08 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.27 | +0.21 |
Drawdowns
NUDM vs. NURE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NUDM drawdown since its inception was -32.01%, smaller than the maximum NURE drawdown of -46.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUDM and NURE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NUDM | NURE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.01% | -46.05% | +14.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.50% | -9.13% | -3.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.47% | -21.03% | +7.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.09% | -35.98% | +5.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.71% | -12.49% | +10.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.86% | -12.30% | +5.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.34% | 4.39% | -1.05% |
Volatility
NUDM vs. NURE - Volatility Comparison
Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF (NUDM) has a higher volatility of 5.22% compared to Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF (NURE) at 4.20%. This indicates that NUDM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NURE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NUDM | NURE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.22% | 4.20% | +1.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.03% | 11.43% | +1.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.74% | 15.80% | -0.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.64% | 19.65% | -3.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.59% | 21.80% | -4.21% |
NUDM vs. NURE - Expense Ratio Comparison
NUDM has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than NURE's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
NUDM vs. NURE - Dividend Comparison
NUDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.92%, more than NURE's 4.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NUDM Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF | 6.92% | 7.46% | 3.33% | 3.14% | 1.98% | 4.31% | 1.47% | 3.42% | 2.45% | 0.47% | 0.00% |
NURE Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF | 4.48% | 4.56% | 3.51% | 3.73% | 2.80% | 1.34% | 3.41% | 3.28% | 4.11% | 3.86% | 0.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NUDM and NURE have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NUDM has higher volatility (5.22%) compared to NURE (4.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUDM dropped -32.01% vs NURE's -46.05%.
On 5-year performance, NUDM leads with 7.98% vs 1.55% for NURE. On fees, NUDM is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, NURE has been the lower-risk option at 4.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, NUDM has performed better with a 7.98% return vs 1.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NUDM is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for NURE.
NUDM has the higher dividend yield at 6.92%, compared with 4.48% for NURE.
NUDM is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while NURE is REIT. NUDM tracks MSCI TIAA ESG International DM, while NURE tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Short-Term REIT Index. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for NUDM and 0.35% for NURE.
NUDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NUDM and NURE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer