PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NUDM vs. NURE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NUDM vs. NURE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF (NUDM) and Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF (NURE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NUDM vs. NURE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NUDM
Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF
-0.28%29.60%5.47%17.70%-15.16%10.62%10.06%24.58%-14.82%8.40%
NURE
Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF
-2.11%-7.51%6.65%13.09%-28.48%53.41%-7.24%25.10%0.02%2.64%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUDM achieves a -0.28% return, which is significantly higher than NURE's -2.11% return.


NUDM

1D
3.56%
1M
-9.02%
YTD
-0.28%
6M
3.27%
1Y
21.98%
3Y*
13.76%
5Y*
7.54%
10Y*

NURE

1D
0.94%
1M
-6.68%
YTD
-2.11%
6M
-3.10%
1Y
-8.77%
3Y*
1.13%
5Y*
1.03%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NUDM vs. NURE - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUDM has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than NURE's 0.35% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

NUDM vs. NURE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUDM
NUDM Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
NUDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUDM Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
NUDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUDM Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

NURE
NURE Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
NURE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NURE Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
NURE Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
NURE Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
NURE Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUDM vs. NURE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF (NUDM) and Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF (NURE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NUDMNUREDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.24

-0.45

+1.70

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.74

-0.53

+2.27

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

0.94

+0.31

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.66

-0.56

+2.22

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.66

-1.20

+7.86

NUDM vs. NURE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUDM Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is higher than the NURE Sharpe Ratio of -0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUDM and NURE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NUDMNUREDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

-0.45

+1.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.05

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.21

+0.23

Correlation

The correlation between NUDM and NURE is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

NUDM vs. NURE - Dividend Comparison

NUDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.48%, more than NURE's 5.08% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
NUDM
Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF
7.48%7.46%3.33%3.14%1.98%4.31%1.47%3.42%2.45%0.47%0.00%
NURE
Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF
5.08%4.56%3.51%3.73%2.80%1.34%3.41%3.28%4.11%3.86%0.48%

Drawdowns

NUDM vs. NURE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUDM drawdown since its inception was -32.01%, smaller than the maximum NURE drawdown of -46.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUDM and NURE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NUDMNUREDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.01%

-46.05%

+14.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.50%

-14.10%

+1.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.09%

-35.98%

+5.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.16%

-22.83%

+13.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.92%

-12.23%

+5.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.12%

6.52%

-3.40%

Volatility

NUDM vs. NURE - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF (NUDM) has a higher volatility of 8.28% compared to Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF (NURE) at 4.58%. This indicates that NUDM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NURE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NUDMNUREDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.28%

4.58%

+3.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.67%

10.91%

+0.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.77%

19.42%

-1.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.47%

19.58%

-3.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.56%

21.89%

-4.33%