PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NUDM vs. NUDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NUDM vs. NUDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF (NUDM) and Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF (NUDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUDM achieves a 12.01% return, which is significantly lower than NUDV's 13.96% return.


NUDM

1D
0.35%
1M
1.07%
6M
6.46%
YTD
12.01%
1Y
25.69%
3Y*
17.61%
5Y*
8.93%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.69%

NUDV

1D
0.32%
1M
1.63%
6M
8.28%
YTD
13.96%
1Y
23.41%
3Y*
15.08%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.51M$2.03M$1.85M
$325.02K$233.14K$178.66K

NUDM vs. NUDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
NUDM
Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF
12.01%29.60%5.47%17.70%-15.16%0.33%
NUDV
Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF
13.96%10.77%14.02%10.13%-7.83%8.35%

Correlation

The correlation between NUDM and NUDV is 0.51, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2021

0.68

The correlation between NUDM and NUDV shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.68 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

NUDM vs. NUDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NUDM
NUDV

Financial Services

27.7%
23.4%

Industrials

20.8%
12.2%

Technology

14.6%
13.3%

Healthcare

9.9%
13.7%

Consumer Defensive

6.0%
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

5.0%
5.7%

Basic Materials

4.8%
4.2%

Communication Services

4.6%
3.4%

Utilities

4.2%
6.6%

Real Estate

1.6%
4.5%

Energy

0.6%
2.6%

Financial Services

NUDM
27.7%
NUDV
23.4%

Industrials

NUDM
20.8%
NUDV
12.2%

Technology

NUDM
14.6%
NUDV
13.3%

Healthcare

NUDM
9.9%
NUDV
13.7%

Consumer Defensive

NUDM
6.0%
NUDV
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

NUDM
5.0%
NUDV
5.7%

Basic Materials

NUDM
4.8%
NUDV
4.2%

Communication Services

NUDM
4.6%
NUDV
3.4%

Utilities

NUDM
4.2%
NUDV
6.6%

Real Estate

NUDM
1.6%
NUDV
4.5%

Energy

NUDM
0.6%
NUDV
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NUDM vs. NUDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NUDM
NUDM Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
NUDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUDM Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
NUDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUDM Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

NUDV
NUDV Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
NUDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUDV Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
NUDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUDV Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NUDM vs. NUDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF (NUDM) and Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF (NUDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NUDMNUDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.40

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.06

3.57

-1.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.74

13.05

-5.30

NUDM vs. NUDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUDM Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is lower than the NUDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUDM and NUDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NUDM vs. NUDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUDM drawdown since its inception was -32.01%, which is greater than NUDV's maximum drawdown of -20.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUDM and NUDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NUDMNUDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.01%

-20.10%

-11.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.50%

-6.60%

-5.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.47%

-16.48%

+3.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.40%

+1.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.76%

-4.77%

-1.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.33%

1.80%

+1.53%

Volatility

NUDM vs. NUDV - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF (NUDM) has a higher volatility of 4.56% compared to Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF (NUDV) at 3.12%. This indicates that NUDM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NUDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NUDMNUDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.56%

3.12%

+1.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.07%

7.67%

+6.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.37%

10.38%

+5.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.77%

14.84%

+1.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.58%

14.84%

+2.74%

NUDM vs. NUDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUDM has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than NUDV's 0.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

NUDM vs. NUDV - Dividend Comparison

NUDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.66%, more than NUDV's 2.25% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
NUDM
Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF
6.66%7.46%3.33%3.14%1.98%4.31%1.47%3.42%2.45%0.47%
NUDV
Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF
2.25%2.36%6.18%2.48%2.96%0.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NUDM and NUDV have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NUDM has higher volatility (4.56%) compared to NUDV (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUDM dropped -32.01% vs NUDV's -20.10%.

On 3-year performance, NUDM leads with 17.61% vs 15.08% for NUDV. On fees, NUDV is cheaper at 0.26% per year. On volatility, NUDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, NUDM has performed better with a 17.61% return vs 15.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NUDV is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for NUDM.

NUDM has the higher dividend yield at 6.66%, compared with 2.25% for NUDV.

NUDM is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while NUDV is Large Cap Value Equities. NUDM tracks MSCI TIAA ESG International DM, while NUDV tracks Nuveen ESG USA High Dividend Yield Index. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for NUDM and 0.26% for NUDV.

NUDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NUDM and NUDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer