NUBD vs. NDVG
NUBD (Nuveen ESG U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF) and NDVG (Nuveen Dividend Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NUBD is a Intermediate Core Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg MSCI U.S. Aggregate ESG Select Index, while NDVG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Nuveen. NUBD is passively managed, while NDVG is actively managed. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NUBD charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for NDVG.
Performance
NUBD vs. NDVG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NUBD
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 0.20%
- 6M
- 0.09%
- 1Y
- 4.97%
- 3Y*
- 3.77%
- 5Y*
- -0.06%
- 10Y*
- —
NDVG
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NUBD vs. NDVG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NUBD Nuveen ESG U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.20% | 6.75% | 1.31% | 5.42% | -12.90% | -1.37% |
NDVG Nuveen Dividend Growth ETF | -1.62% | 10.06% | 17.60% | 15.15% | -9.55% | 11.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between NUBD and NDVG is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2021 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NUBD vs. NDVG — Risk / Return Rank
NUBD
NDVG
NUBD vs. NDVG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUBD) and Nuveen Dividend Growth ETF (NDVG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NUBD | NDVG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.81 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.38 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NUBD | NDVG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.32 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | — | — |
Drawdowns
NUBD vs. NDVG - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NUBD | NDVG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.45% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.76% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.94% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.93% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.05% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.93% | — | — |
Volatility
NUBD vs. NDVG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NUBD | NDVG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.23% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.61% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.79% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.99% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.12% | — | — |
NUBD vs. NDVG - Expense Ratio Comparison
NUBD has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than NDVG's 0.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
NUBD vs. NDVG - Dividend Comparison
NUBD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.99%, less than NDVG's 4.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NDVG Nuveen Dividend Growth ETF | 4.41% | 1.05% | 1.20% | 1.24% | 1.34% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NUBD Nuveen ESG U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 3.99% | 3.90% | 3.51% | 2.99% | 2.83% | 2.05% | 2.21% | 2.66% | 3.08% | 0.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NUBD and NDVG have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NUBD is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NUBD is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for NDVG.
NDVG has the higher dividend yield at 4.41%, compared with 3.99% for NUBD.
NUBD is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while NDVG is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for NUBD and 0.64% for NDVG.
Find the right allocation for NUBD and NDVG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer