PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NUBD vs. NCLO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NUBD vs. NCLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen ESG U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUBD) and Nuveen AA-BBB CLO ETF (NCLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NUBD vs. NCLO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
NUBD
Nuveen ESG U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
-0.01%6.75%-1.40%
NCLO
Nuveen AA-BBB CLO ETF
0.33%6.28%0.35%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUBD achieves a -0.01% return, which is significantly lower than NCLO's 0.33% return.


NUBD

1D
0.04%
1M
-1.45%
YTD
-0.01%
6M
0.63%
1Y
3.85%
3Y*
3.40%
5Y*
0.05%
10Y*

NCLO

1D
-0.03%
1M
-0.17%
YTD
0.33%
6M
2.03%
1Y
5.57%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NUBD vs. NCLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUBD has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than NCLO's 0.26% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

NUBD vs. NCLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUBD
NUBD Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
NUBD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUBD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUBD Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
NUBD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUBD Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

NCLO
NCLO Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
NCLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NCLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
NCLO Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
NCLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
NCLO Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUBD vs. NCLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUBD) and Nuveen AA-BBB CLO ETF (NCLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NUBDNCLODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.94

1.32

-0.38

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.34

1.75

-0.41

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.36

-0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.65

1.80

-0.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.48

10.65

-6.18

NUBD vs. NCLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUBD Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is comparable to the NCLO Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUBD and NCLO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NUBDNCLODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

1.32

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

1.44

-1.15

Correlation

The correlation between NUBD and NCLO is 0.04, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

NUBD vs. NCLO - Dividend Comparison

NUBD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%, less than NCLO's 5.91% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
NUBD
Nuveen ESG U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
3.92%3.90%3.51%2.99%2.83%2.05%2.21%2.66%3.08%0.58%
NCLO
Nuveen AA-BBB CLO ETF
5.91%6.09%0.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

NUBD vs. NCLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUBD drawdown since its inception was -19.45%, which is greater than NCLO's maximum drawdown of -3.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUBD and NCLO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NUBDNCLODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.45%

-3.05%

-16.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.50%

-3.05%

+0.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.13%

-0.51%

-3.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.10%

-0.21%

-5.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.92%

0.52%

+0.40%

Volatility

NUBD vs. NCLO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen ESG U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUBD) is 1.59%, while Nuveen AA-BBB CLO ETF (NCLO) has a volatility of 2.98%. This indicates that NUBD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NCLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NUBDNCLODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.59%

2.98%

-1.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.49%

3.29%

-0.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.13%

4.23%

-0.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.97%

3.76%

+2.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.14%

3.76%

+1.38%