NUAG vs. BIV
NUAG (Nuveen Enhanced Yield U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF) and BIV (Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds - NUAG tracks the ICE BofA Enhanced Yield US Broad Bond while BIV tracks the Bloomberg U.S. 5–10 Year Government/Credit Float Adjusted Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NUAG returned 0.51%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for BIV. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NUAG charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for BIV.
Performance
NUAG vs. BIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NUAG achieves a 0.67% return, which is significantly higher than BIV's -0.11% return.
NUAG
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- YTD
- 0.67%
- 6M
- 0.70%
- 1Y
- 5.51%
- 3Y*
- 4.97%
- 5Y*
- 0.51%
- 10Y*
- —
BIV
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 0.04%
- YTD
- -0.11%
- 6M
- -0.10%
- 1Y
- 4.33%
- 3Y*
- 4.34%
- 5Y*
- 0.28%
- 10Y*
- 1.93%
NUAG vs. BIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NUAG Nuveen Enhanced Yield U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.67% | 7.37% | 2.02% | 7.52% | -13.97% | -2.03% | 7.48% | 10.13% | -1.45% | 3.98% |
BIV Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF | -0.11% | 8.52% | 1.57% | 6.07% | -13.21% | -2.40% | 9.67% | 10.34% | -0.19% | 3.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between NUAG and BIV is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2016 | 0.84 |
The correlation between NUAG and BIV shifts across timeframes, from 0.84 (all time) to 0.96 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NUAG vs. BIV — Risk / Return Rank
NUAG
BIV
NUAG vs. BIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Enhanced Yield U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUAG) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF (BIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NUAG | BIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.19 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.18 | 1.37 | +0.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.58 | 4.13 | +2.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NUAG | BIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.56 | 1.08 | +0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 | 0.04 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.35 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.65 | -0.33 |
Drawdowns
NUAG vs. BIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NUAG drawdown since its inception was -19.79%, roughly equal to the maximum BIV drawdown of -18.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUAG and BIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NUAG | BIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.79% | -18.95% | -0.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.54% | -3.18% | +0.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.61% | -6.07% | +0.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.19% | -18.74% | -0.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.06% | -1.91% | +0.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.95% | -3.39% | -1.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.84% | 1.05% | -0.21% |
Volatility
NUAG vs. BIV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Nuveen Enhanced Yield U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUAG) is 1.15%, while Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF (BIV) has a volatility of 1.36%. This indicates that NUAG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NUAG | BIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.15% | 1.36% | -0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.59% | 2.90% | -0.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.58% | 4.06% | -0.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.01% | 6.40% | -0.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.48% | 5.50% | -0.02% |
NUAG vs. BIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
NUAG has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than BIV's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
NUAG vs. BIV - Dividend Comparison
NUAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.49%, more than BIV's 4.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIV Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF | 4.21% | 4.01% | 3.79% | 3.09% | 2.41% | 3.42% | 2.95% | 2.75% | 2.88% | 2.69% | 3.01% | 3.02% |
NUAG Nuveen Enhanced Yield U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 4.49% | 4.43% | 4.44% | 3.95% | 3.60% | 2.27% | 2.93% | 3.54% | 3.79% | 3.38% | 0.48% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, NUAG and BIV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
BIV has higher volatility (1.36%) compared to NUAG (1.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUAG dropped -19.79% vs BIV's -18.95%.
On 5-year performance, NUAG leads with 0.51% vs 0.28% for BIV. On fees, BIV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, NUAG has been the lower-risk option at 1.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, NUAG has performed better with a 0.51% return vs 0.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BIV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for NUAG.
NUAG has the higher dividend yield at 4.49%, compared with 4.21% for BIV.
NUAG tracks ICE BofA Enhanced Yield US Broad Bond, while BIV tracks Bloomberg U.S. 5–10 Year Government/Credit Float Adjusted Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Nuveen and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for NUAG and 0.03% for BIV.
NUAG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NUAG and BIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer