NTSX vs. THRV
NTSX (WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund) and THRV (Prospera Income ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NTSX charges 0.20%/yr vs 1.80%/yr for THRV.
Performance
NTSX vs. THRV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NTSX achieves a 8.62% return, which is significantly higher than THRV's 1.86% return.
NTSX
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- 4.37%
- YTD
- 8.62%
- 6M
- 7.83%
- 1Y
- 25.27%
- 3Y*
- 19.38%
- 5Y*
- 9.69%
- 10Y*
- —
THRV
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 1.86%
- 6M
- 1.66%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NTSX vs. THRV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NTSX WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund | 8.62% | 1.96% |
THRV Prospera Income ETF | 1.86% | 0.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between NTSX and THRV is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025 | 0.71 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NTSX vs. THRV — Risk / Return Rank
NTSX
THRV
NTSX vs. THRV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) and Prospera Income ETF (THRV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NTSX | THRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.06 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.81 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.77 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.25 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NTSX | THRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.06 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 1.04 | -0.33 |
Drawdowns
NTSX vs. THRV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NTSX drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, which is greater than THRV's maximum drawdown of -1.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTSX and THRV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NTSX | THRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.34% | -1.50% | -29.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.82% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.05% | -0.51% | -0.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.79% | -0.44% | -6.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.07% | — | — |
Volatility
NTSX vs. THRV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NTSX | THRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.39% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.58% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.31% | 2.92% | +9.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.04% | 2.92% | +14.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.27% | 2.92% | +15.35% |
NTSX vs. THRV - Expense Ratio Comparison
NTSX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than THRV's 1.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
NTSX vs. THRV - Dividend Comparison
NTSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, less than THRV's 4.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NTSX WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund | 1.08% | 1.14% | 1.14% | 1.21% | 1.36% | 0.82% | 0.92% | 1.42% | 0.62% |
THRV Prospera Income ETF | 4.71% | 1.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NTSX and THRV have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NTSX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NTSX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 1.80% for THRV.
THRV has the higher dividend yield at 4.71%, compared with 1.08% for NTSX.
They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Prospera Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for NTSX and 1.80% for THRV.
Find the right allocation for NTSX and THRV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer