PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NTSX vs. RPAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NTSX vs. RPAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) and RPAR Risk Parity ETF (RPAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NTSX vs. RPAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
NTSX
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
-4.22%18.82%20.20%22.70%-25.84%22.21%24.87%1.28%
RPAR
RPAR Risk Parity ETF
4.45%17.91%0.06%6.03%-22.82%7.56%19.40%0.11%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NTSX achieves a -4.22% return, which is significantly lower than RPAR's 4.45% return.


NTSX

1D
0.38%
1M
-5.07%
YTD
-4.22%
6M
-2.82%
1Y
16.25%
3Y*
15.70%
5Y*
8.07%
10Y*

RPAR

1D
0.58%
1M
-4.89%
YTD
4.45%
6M
6.49%
1Y
16.02%
3Y*
7.42%
5Y*
2.36%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NTSX vs. RPAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

NTSX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than RPAR's 0.51% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

NTSX vs. RPAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NTSX
NTSX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
NTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
NTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

RPAR
RPAR Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
RPAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPAR Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
RPAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPAR Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NTSX vs. RPAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) and RPAR Risk Parity ETF (RPAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NTSXRPARDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.89

1.37

-0.48

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.30

1.89

-0.59

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.26

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.52

2.02

-0.50

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.52

7.13

-0.61

NTSX vs. RPAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NTSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is lower than the RPAR Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NTSX and RPAR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NTSXRPARDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

1.37

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.19

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.33

+0.29

Correlation

The correlation between NTSX and RPAR is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

NTSX vs. RPAR - Dividend Comparison

NTSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, less than RPAR's 2.13% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
NTSX
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
1.22%1.14%1.14%1.21%1.36%0.82%0.92%1.42%0.62%
RPAR
RPAR Risk Parity ETF
2.13%2.55%2.51%3.16%4.01%2.02%0.76%0.23%0.00%

Drawdowns

NTSX vs. RPAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NTSX drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, roughly equal to the maximum RPAR drawdown of -30.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTSX and RPAR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NTSXRPARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.34%

-30.16%

-1.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.13%

-8.10%

-3.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.34%

-30.16%

-1.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.04%

-5.42%

-0.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.92%

-11.83%

+4.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.60%

2.30%

+0.30%

Volatility

NTSX vs. RPAR - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) has a higher volatility of 6.11% compared to RPAR Risk Parity ETF (RPAR) at 4.61%. This indicates that NTSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RPAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NTSXRPARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.11%

4.61%

+1.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.65%

7.76%

+1.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.38%

11.74%

+6.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.04%

12.35%

+4.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.38%

12.73%

+5.65%