NTSX vs. QUAL
NTSX (WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund) and QUAL (iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NTSX is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by WisdomTree, while QUAL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index. NTSX is actively managed, while QUAL is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NTSX returned 9.23%/yr vs 11.97%/yr for QUAL. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NTSX charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QUAL.
Performance
NTSX vs. QUAL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NTSX achieves a 7.28% return, which is significantly lower than QUAL's 9.44% return.
NTSX
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -0.68%
- YTD
- 7.28%
- 6M
- 7.49%
- 1Y
- 23.34%
- 3Y*
- 18.55%
- 5Y*
- 9.23%
- 10Y*
- —
QUAL
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 2.14%
- YTD
- 9.44%
- 6M
- 9.29%
- 1Y
- 22.87%
- 3Y*
- 19.30%
- 5Y*
- 11.97%
- 10Y*
- 14.46%
NTSX vs. QUAL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NTSX WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund | 7.28% | 18.82% | 20.20% | 22.70% | -25.84% | 22.21% | 24.87% | 32.03% | -7.87% |
QUAL iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF | 9.44% | 12.65% | 22.29% | 30.88% | -20.50% | 26.94% | 17.04% | 33.89% | -10.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between NTSX and QUAL is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2018 | 0.91 |
The correlation between NTSX and QUAL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
NTSX vs. QUAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NTSX
QUAL
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
NTSX
QUAL
Communication Services
NTSX
QUAL
Financial Services
NTSX
QUAL
Consumer Cyclical
NTSX
QUAL
Healthcare
NTSX
QUAL
Industrials
NTSX
QUAL
Consumer Defensive
NTSX
QUAL
Energy
NTSX
QUAL
Utilities
NTSX
QUAL
Real Estate
NTSX
QUAL
Basic Materials
NTSX
QUAL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NTSX vs. QUAL — Risk / Return Rank
NTSX
QUAL
NTSX vs. QUAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) and iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NTSX | QUAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.31 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | 2.32 | +0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.43 | 10.60 | -0.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NTSX vs. QUAL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NTSX drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, smaller than the maximum QUAL drawdown of -34.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTSX and QUAL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NTSX | QUAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.34% | -34.06% | +2.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.16% | -9.03% | -0.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.82% | -18.00% | +1.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.34% | -28.23% | -3.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.27% | -0.19% | -2.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.78% | -4.10% | -2.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.13% | 1.99% | +0.14% |
Volatility
NTSX vs. QUAL - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) has a higher volatility of 5.05% compared to iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL) at 3.63%. This indicates that NTSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QUAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NTSX | QUAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.05% | 3.63% | +1.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.34% | 9.43% | +0.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.92% | 12.10% | +0.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.13% | 17.36% | -0.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.30% | 18.11% | +0.19% |
NTSX vs. QUAL - Expense Ratio Comparison
NTSX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than QUAL's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
NTSX vs. QUAL - Dividend Comparison
NTSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, more than QUAL's 0.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NTSX WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund | 1.09% | 1.14% | 1.14% | 1.21% | 1.36% | 0.82% | 0.92% | 1.42% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QUAL iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF | 0.87% | 0.94% | 1.02% | 1.23% | 1.59% | 1.20% | 1.39% | 1.60% | 2.00% | 1.76% | 1.96% | 1.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NTSX and QUAL have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NTSX has higher volatility (5.05%) compared to QUAL (3.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTSX dropped -31.34% vs QUAL's -34.06%.
On 5-year performance, QUAL leads with 11.97% vs 9.23% for NTSX. On fees, QUAL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QUAL has been the lower-risk option at 3.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QUAL has performed better with a 11.97% return vs 9.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QUAL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for NTSX.
NTSX has the higher dividend yield at 1.09%, compared with 0.87% for QUAL.
NTSX is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while QUAL is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for NTSX and 0.15% for QUAL.
QUAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NTSX and QUAL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer