NTSX vs. DGRO
NTSX (WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund) and DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NTSX is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by WisdomTree, while DGRO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. NTSX is actively managed, while DGRO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NTSX returned 9.23%/yr vs 10.82%/yr for DGRO. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NTSX charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for DGRO.
Performance
NTSX vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NTSX achieves a 7.28% return, which is significantly lower than DGRO's 9.86% return.
NTSX
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -0.68%
- YTD
- 7.28%
- 6M
- 7.49%
- 1Y
- 23.34%
- 3Y*
- 18.55%
- 5Y*
- 9.23%
- 10Y*
- —
DGRO
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 2.86%
- YTD
- 9.86%
- 6M
- 9.27%
- 1Y
- 23.49%
- 3Y*
- 16.74%
- 5Y*
- 10.82%
- 10Y*
- 13.52%
NTSX vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NTSX WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund | 7.28% | 18.82% | 20.20% | 22.70% | -25.84% | 22.21% | 24.87% | 32.03% | -7.87% |
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 9.86% | 15.69% | 16.62% | 10.47% | -7.91% | 26.64% | 9.50% | 29.87% | -6.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between NTSX and DGRO is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2018 | 0.80 |
The correlation between NTSX and DGRO shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
NTSX vs. DGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NTSX
DGRO
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Technology
NTSX
DGRO
Communication Services
NTSX
DGRO
Financial Services
NTSX
DGRO
Consumer Cyclical
NTSX
DGRO
Healthcare
NTSX
DGRO
Industrials
NTSX
DGRO
Consumer Defensive
NTSX
DGRO
Energy
NTSX
DGRO
Utilities
NTSX
DGRO
Real Estate
NTSX
DGRO
-
Basic Materials
NTSX
DGRO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NTSX vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank
NTSX
DGRO
NTSX vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NTSX | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.42 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | 3.46 | -1.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.43 | 13.36 | -2.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NTSX vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NTSX drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, smaller than the maximum DGRO drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTSX and DGRO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NTSX | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.34% | -35.10% | +3.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.16% | -6.47% | -2.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.82% | -14.03% | -2.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.34% | -19.31% | -12.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.27% | 0.00% | -2.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.78% | -3.44% | -3.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.13% | 1.68% | +0.45% |
Volatility
NTSX vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) has a higher volatility of 5.05% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 2.64%. This indicates that NTSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NTSX | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.05% | 2.64% | +2.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.34% | 6.96% | +3.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.92% | 9.59% | +3.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.13% | 13.83% | +3.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.30% | 16.62% | +1.68% |
NTSX vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison
NTSX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
NTSX vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison
NTSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, less than DGRO's 1.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 1.94% | 2.09% | 2.26% | 2.45% | 2.34% | 1.93% | 2.30% | 2.21% | 2.44% | 2.03% | 2.27% | 2.52% |
NTSX WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund | 1.09% | 1.14% | 1.14% | 1.21% | 1.36% | 0.82% | 0.92% | 1.42% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NTSX and DGRO have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NTSX has higher volatility (5.05%) compared to DGRO (2.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTSX dropped -31.34% vs DGRO's -35.10%.
On 5-year performance, DGRO leads with 10.82% vs 9.23% for NTSX. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DGRO has performed better with a 10.82% return vs 9.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for NTSX.
DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.94%, compared with 1.09% for NTSX.
NTSX is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while DGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for NTSX and 0.08% for DGRO.
DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NTSX and DGRO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer