NTSE vs. THRV
NTSE (WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund) and THRV (Prospera Income ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NTSE charges 0.38%/yr vs 1.80%/yr for THRV.
Performance
NTSE vs. THRV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NTSE achieves a 26.85% return, which is significantly higher than THRV's 1.77% return.
NTSE
- 1D
- -5.15%
- 1M
- 3.45%
- YTD
- 26.85%
- 6M
- 28.76%
- 1Y
- 52.35%
- 3Y*
- 23.39%
- 5Y*
- 5.82%
- 10Y*
- —
THRV
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- -0.35%
- YTD
- 1.77%
- 6M
- 1.87%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NTSE vs. THRV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NTSE WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund | 26.85% | 5.64% |
THRV Prospera Income ETF | 1.77% | 0.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between NTSE and THRV is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2025 | 0.61 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NTSE vs. THRV — Risk / Return Rank
NTSE
THRV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
NTSE vs. THRV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund (NTSE) and Prospera Income ETF (THRV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NTSE | THRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.71 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.65 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NTSE vs. THRV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NTSE drawdown since its inception was -42.84%, which is greater than THRV's maximum drawdown of -1.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTSE and THRV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NTSE | THRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.84% | -1.50% | -41.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.20% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.15% | -0.60% | -4.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.57% | -0.44% | -19.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.85% | — | — |
Volatility
NTSE vs. THRV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NTSE | THRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.65% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.31% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.42% | 2.95% | +20.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.88% | 2.95% | +16.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.77% | 2.95% | +16.82% |
NTSE vs. THRV - Expense Ratio Comparison
NTSE has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than THRV's 1.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
NTSE vs. THRV - Dividend Comparison
NTSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, less than THRV's 5.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NTSE WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund | 2.61% | 3.35% | 3.23% | 2.44% | 3.22% | 2.10% |
THRV Prospera Income ETF | 5.40% | 1.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NTSE and THRV have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NTSE is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NTSE is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 1.80% for THRV.
THRV has the higher dividend yield at 5.40%, compared with 2.61% for NTSE.
They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Prospera Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for NTSE and 1.80% for THRV.
Find the right allocation for NTSE and THRV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer