PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NTSE vs. MDIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NTSE vs. MDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund (NTSE) and First Trust Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index Fund (MDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NTSE achieves a 20.86% return, which is significantly higher than MDIV's 11.80% return.


NTSE

1D
-2.05%
1M
-6.67%
6M
13.48%
YTD
20.86%
1Y
39.75%
3Y*
19.82%
5Y*
5.20%
10Y*

MDIV

1D
1.01%
1M
3.14%
6M
9.06%
YTD
11.80%
1Y
13.71%
3Y*
11.66%
5Y*
6.77%
10Y*
4.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NTSE vs. MDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
NTSE
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund
20.86%36.29%4.42%9.47%-26.31%-5.67%
MDIV
First Trust Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index Fund
11.80%3.77%10.05%11.50%-3.86%2.85%

Correlation

The correlation between NTSE and MDIV is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 2021

0.42

Over the past year, the correlation between NTSE and MDIV has dropped to 0.18 - well below their long-term average of 0.42, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NTSE vs. MDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NTSE
NTSE Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
NTSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTSE Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
NTSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTSE Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

MDIV
MDIV Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
MDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
MDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NTSE vs. MDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund (NTSE) and First Trust Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index Fund (MDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NTSEMDIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.37

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.81

4.06

-1.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.50

11.26

-1.76

NTSE vs. MDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NTSE Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the MDIV Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NTSE and MDIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NTSE vs. MDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NTSE drawdown since its inception was -42.84%, smaller than the maximum MDIV drawdown of -48.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTSE and MDIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NTSEMDIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.84%

-48.50%

+5.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.20%

-3.39%

-10.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.73%

-9.62%

-9.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.15%

-13.02%

-28.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.63%

0.00%

-9.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.40%

-4.55%

-14.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.19%

1.22%

+2.97%

Volatility

NTSE vs. MDIV - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund (NTSE) has a higher volatility of 10.13% compared to First Trust Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index Fund (MDIV) at 1.93%. This indicates that NTSE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NTSEMDIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.13%

1.93%

+8.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.38%

4.54%

+17.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.41%

6.61%

+17.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.13%

10.92%

+9.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.93%

15.20%

+4.73%

NTSE vs. MDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

NTSE has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than MDIV's 0.73% expense ratio.


Dividends

NTSE vs. MDIV - Dividend Comparison

NTSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, less than MDIV's 6.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MDIV
First Trust Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index Fund
6.59%6.51%6.40%6.08%6.71%5.30%6.00%5.90%6.76%6.04%6.35%7.38%
NTSE
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund
2.72%3.35%3.23%2.44%3.22%2.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NTSE and MDIV have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NTSE has higher volatility (10.13%) compared to MDIV (1.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTSE dropped -42.84% vs MDIV's -48.50%.

On 5-year performance, MDIV leads with 6.77% vs 5.20% for NTSE. On fees, NTSE is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, MDIV has been the lower-risk option at 1.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, MDIV has performed better with a 6.77% return vs 5.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NTSE is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for MDIV.

MDIV has the higher dividend yield at 6.59%, compared with 2.72% for NTSE.

They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for NTSE and 0.73% for MDIV.

MDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NTSE and MDIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer