NTSD vs. SDIV
NTSD (WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund) and SDIV (Global X SuperDividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NTSD is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by WisdomTree, while SDIV is a Global Equities fund tracking the Solactive Global SuperDividend Index. NTSD is actively managed, while SDIV is passively managed. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NTSD charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for SDIV.
Performance
NTSD vs. SDIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NTSD
- 1D
- -2.11%
- 1M
- -0.58%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SDIV
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -2.85%
- YTD
- 4.72%
- 6M
- 5.07%
- 1Y
- 20.36%
- 3Y*
- 14.94%
- 5Y*
- -0.74%
- 10Y*
- 0.07%
NTSD vs. SDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
NTSD WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund | 15.69% |
SDIV Global X SuperDividend ETF | -0.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between NTSD and SDIV is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2026 | 0.63 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NTSD vs. SDIV — Risk / Return Rank
NTSD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SDIV
NTSD vs. SDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD) and Global X SuperDividend ETF (SDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NTSD | SDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.28 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.78 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.64 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NTSD vs. SDIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NTSD drawdown since its inception was -5.58%, smaller than the maximum SDIV drawdown of -56.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTSD and SDIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NTSD | SDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.58% | -56.90% | +51.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -40.32% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -56.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.97% | -18.75% | +15.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.09% | -18.58% | +17.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.36% | — |
Volatility
NTSD vs. SDIV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NTSD | SDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.88% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.90% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.11% | 12.69% | +12.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.11% | 16.86% | +8.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.11% | 18.93% | +6.18% |
NTSD vs. SDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
NTSD has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than SDIV's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
NTSD vs. SDIV - Dividend Comparison
NTSD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.34%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NTSD WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SDIV Global X SuperDividend ETF | 9.34% | 9.59% | 11.33% | 11.73% | 14.17% | 8.95% | 7.96% | 8.73% | 9.22% | 6.66% | 6.95% | 7.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NTSD and SDIV have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NTSD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NTSD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for SDIV.
SDIV has the higher dividend yield at 9.34%, compared with 0.00% for NTSD.
NTSD is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SDIV is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for NTSD and 0.58% for SDIV.
Find the right allocation for NTSD and SDIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer