PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NTSD vs. COTG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NTSD vs. COTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


NTSD

1D
-1.11%
1M
7.13%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

COTG

1D
1.39%
1M
-11.21%
YTD
17.32%
6M
1.51%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NTSD vs. COTG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NTSD and COTG is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2026

-0.25

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NTSD vs. COTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

NTSD vs. COTG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NTSDCOTGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

5.08

-0.28

+5.36

Drawdowns

NTSD vs. COTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NTSD drawdown since its inception was -5.20%, smaller than the maximum COTG drawdown of -25.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTSD and COTG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NTSDCOTGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.20%

-25.69%

+20.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.11%

-23.48%

+22.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.84%

-8.35%

+7.51%

Volatility

NTSD vs. COTG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NTSDCOTGDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.28%

40.65%

-16.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.28%

40.65%

-16.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.28%

40.65%

-16.37%

NTSD vs. COTG - Expense Ratio Comparison

NTSD has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than COTG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

NTSD vs. COTG - Dividend Comparison

Neither NTSD nor COTG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


NTSD and COTG have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NTSD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NTSD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for COTG.

NTSD and COTG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for NTSD and 0.75% for COTG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NTSD and COTG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer