NTSD vs. CELT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NTSD (WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund) and CELT (Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. NTSD charges 0.35%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for CELT.

Performance

NTSD vs. CELT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD) and Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF (CELT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

NTSD

• 1D: -1.11%
• 1M: 7.13%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CELT

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NTSD vs. CELT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
NTSD WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund	17.91%
CELT Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF	0.00%

Return for Risk

NTSD vs. CELT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD) and Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF (CELT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NTSD	CELT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	5.08	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	NTSD	CELT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.20%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.11%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.84%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NTSD	CELT	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.28%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.28%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.28%	—	—

NTSD vs. CELT - Expense Ratio Comparison

NTSD has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than CELT's 1.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

NTSD vs. CELT - Dividend Comparison

Neither NTSD nor CELT has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, NTSD or CELT?

On fees, NTSD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NTSD or CELT?

NTSD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for CELT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NTSD or CELT?

NTSD and CELT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between NTSD and CELT?

They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Tradr ETFs. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for NTSD and 1.30% for CELT.