PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NTRS vs. META
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NTRS vs. META - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Trust Corporation (NTRS) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NTRS achieves a 25.08% return, which is significantly higher than META's -11.24% return. Over the past 10 years, NTRS has underperformed META with an annualized return of 12.06%, while META has yielded a comparatively higher 17.60% annualized return.


NTRS

1D
-0.80%
1M
5.91%
YTD
25.08%
6M
27.99%
1Y
60.27%
3Y*
35.23%
5Y*
10.74%
10Y*
12.06%

META

1D
-1.28%
1M
-3.98%
YTD
-11.24%
6M
-12.06%
1Y
-15.84%
3Y*
30.58%
5Y*
12.31%
10Y*
17.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NTRS vs. META - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NTRS
Northern Trust Corporation
25.08%36.92%25.63%-1.02%-23.82%31.65%-9.29%30.59%-14.68%14.18%
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
-11.24%13.09%66.05%194.13%-64.22%23.13%33.09%56.57%-25.71%53.38%

Correlation

The correlation between NTRS and META is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2012

0.30

The correlation between NTRS and META shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (3 years) to 0.34 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

NTRS:

$9.09

META:

$27.47

PE Ratio

NTRS:

18.59

META:

21.31

PEG Ratio

NTRS:

1.46

META:

0.88

PS Ratio

NTRS:

2.26

META:

7.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

NTRS:

$14.30B

META:

$214.96B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NTRS:

$8.09B

META:

$176.14B

EBITDA (TTM)

NTRS:

$3.21B

META:

$106.31B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NTRS vs. META — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NTRS
NTRS Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
NTRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTRS Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
NTRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTRS Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

META
META Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
META Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
META Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
META Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
META Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
META Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NTRS vs. META - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Trust Corporation (NTRS) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NTRSMETADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

0.94

+0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.89

-0.48

+5.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.20

-1.01

+14.21

NTRS vs. META - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NTRS Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is higher than the META Sharpe Ratio of -0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NTRS and META, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NTRSMETADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.31

-0.45

+2.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.28

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

0.46

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.54

-0.16

Drawdowns

NTRS vs. META - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NTRS drawdown since its inception was -67.67%, smaller than the maximum META drawdown of -76.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTRS and META.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NTRSMETADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.67%

-76.74%

+9.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.39%

-33.30%

+20.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.21%

-34.15%

+8.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.03%

-76.74%

+26.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.03%

-76.74%

+26.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.83%

-25.73%

+23.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.96%

-15.26%

-5.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.58%

15.69%

-11.11%

Volatility

NTRS vs. META - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Northern Trust Corporation (NTRS) is 4.74%, while Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) has a volatility of 10.48%. This indicates that NTRS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than META based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NTRSMETADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.74%

10.48%

-5.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.84%

26.95%

-8.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.27%

35.56%

-9.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.58%

44.05%

-14.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.38%

38.69%

-8.31%

Dividends

NTRS vs. META - Dividend Comparison

NTRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, more than META's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
0.36%0.32%0.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NTRS
Northern Trust Corporation
1.89%2.27%2.93%3.56%3.28%2.34%3.01%2.45%2.32%1.60%1.66%1.96%

Financials

NTRS vs. META - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Northern Trust Corporation and Meta Platforms, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B60.00B20222023202420252026
3.61B
56.31B
(NTRS) Total Revenue
(META) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NTRS vs. META - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Northern Trust Corporation and Meta Platforms, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
58.8%
81.9%
Portfolio components
NTRS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Northern Trust Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.12B and revenue of 3.61B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.8%.

META - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a gross profit of 46.09B and revenue of 56.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.9%.

NTRS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Northern Trust Corporation reported an operating income of 625.80M and revenue of 3.61B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.3%.

META - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported an operating income of 22.87B and revenue of 56.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 40.6%.

NTRS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Northern Trust Corporation reported a net income of 466.00M and revenue of 3.61B, resulting in a net margin of 12.9%.

META - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a net income of 26.77B and revenue of 56.31B, resulting in a net margin of 47.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NTRS and META have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

META has higher volatility (10.48%) compared to NTRS (4.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTRS dropped -67.67% vs META's -76.74%.

NTRS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs -0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NTRS and META

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer