NTR vs. T

Last updated Jul 22, 2026

NTR (Nutrien Ltd.) and T (AT&T Inc.) are both stocks. NTR operates in Agricultural Inputs (Basic Materials), while T operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services). Over the past 5 years, NTR returned 6.03%/yr vs 7.35%/yr for T. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

NTR vs. T - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nutrien Ltd. (NTR) and AT&T Inc. (T). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NTR achieves a 10.07% return, which is significantly higher than T's -5.73% return.

NTR

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: 7.30%
• 6M: 1.06%
• YTD: 10.07%
• 1Y: 16.77%
• 3Y*: 5.34%
• 5Y*: 6.03%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 6.64%

T

• 1D: 1.41%
• 1M: 4.07%
• 6M: -1.30%
• YTD: -5.73%
• 1Y: -13.56%
• 3Y*: 21.50%
• 5Y*: 7.35%
• 10Y*: 2.24%
• ALL TIME*: 9.38%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NTR vs. T - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
NTR Nutrien Ltd.	10.07%	43.33%	-16.97%	-20.19%	0.23%	60.78%	5.60%	5.57%	-7.73%
T AT&T Inc.	-5.73%	13.97%	44.08%	-2.74%	5.76%	-8.09%	-21.37%	45.55%	-22.25%

Correlation

The correlation between NTR and T is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.04
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.13
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.17
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2018	0.22

The correlation between NTR and T shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (1 year) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap NTR : $32.08B T : $154.67B
EPS NTR : $4.94 T : $3.05
PE Ratio NTR : 13.53 T : 7.30
PEG Ratio NTR : 0.20 T : 0.30
PS Ratio NTR : 1.16 T : 1.27
Total Revenue (TTM) NTR : $27.76B T : $125.65B
Gross Profit (TTM) NTR : $8.66B T : $105.41B
EBITDA (TTM) NTR : $6.33B T : $54.70B

Return for Risk

NTR vs. T — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NTR

NTR Risk / Return Rank: 61
NTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
NTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
NTR Omega Ratio Rank: 57
NTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
NTR Martin Ratio Rank: 63

T

T Risk / Return Rank: 22
T Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
T Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
T Omega Ratio Rank: 20
T Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
T Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NTR vs. T - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nutrien Ltd. (NTR) and AT&T Inc. (T). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NTR	T	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.53	-0.58	+1.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.94	-0.68	+1.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	0.92	+0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.61	-0.47	+1.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.60	-1.04	+2.64

NTR vs. T - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NTR Sharpe Ratio is 0.53, which is higher than the T Sharpe Ratio of -0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NTR and T, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NTR vs. T - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NTR drawdown since its inception was -57.80%, smaller than the maximum T drawdown of -64.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTR and T.

Drawdown Indicators

	NTR	T	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.80%	-64.15%	+6.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.56%	-28.89%	+1.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.82%	-28.89%	-3.93%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-57.80%	-32.01%	-25.79%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-42.35%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-31.51%	-20.46%	-11.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.26%	-15.74%	-10.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.53%	13.01%	-2.48%

Volatility

NTR vs. T - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nutrien Ltd. (NTR) is 8.09%, while AT&T Inc. (T) has a volatility of 9.45%. This indicates that NTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than T based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NTR	T	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.09%	9.45%	-1.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.52%	19.94%	+4.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.08%	23.72%	+8.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.16%	24.39%	+9.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.92%	23.92%	+10.00%

Dividends

NTR vs. T - Dividend Comparison

NTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.28%, less than T's 6.49% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NTR Nutrien Ltd.	3.28%	3.53%	4.83%	3.76%	3.51%	2.45%	3.74%	3.67%	3.47%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
T AT&T Inc.	6.49%	4.47%	4.87%	6.62%	6.66%	8.46%	7.23%	5.22%	7.01%	5.04%	4.51%	5.46%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NTR and T in my portfolio?

NTR and T have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NTR or T?

T has higher volatility (9.45%) compared to NTR (8.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTR dropped -57.80% vs T's -64.15%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.53 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.