NTR vs. T

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

NTR (Nutrien Ltd.) and T (AT&T Inc.) are both stocks. NTR operates in Agricultural Inputs (Basic Materials), while T operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services). Over the past 5 years, NTR returned 4.29%/yr vs 6.60%/yr for T. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

NTR vs. T - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nutrien Ltd. (NTR) and AT&T Inc. (T). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NTR achieves a 9.80% return, which is significantly higher than T's -7.40% return.

NTR

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: -1.54%
• YTD: 9.80%
• 6M: 15.63%
• 1Y: 16.58%
• 3Y*: 8.74%
• 5Y*: 4.29%
• 10Y*: —

T

• 1D: -1.10%
• 1M: -10.57%
• YTD: -7.40%
• 6M: -7.40%
• 1Y: -16.38%
• 3Y*: 18.39%
• 5Y*: 6.60%
• 10Y*: 2.86%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NTR vs. T - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
NTR Nutrien Ltd.	9.80%	43.33%	-16.97%	-20.19%	0.23%	60.78%	5.60%	5.57%	-11.36%
T AT&T Inc.	-7.40%	13.97%	44.08%	-2.74%	5.76%	-8.09%	-21.37%	45.55%	-21.57%

Correlation

The correlation between NTR and T is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.00
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.13
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.17
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2018	0.22

The correlation between NTR and T shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS NTR : $4.93 T : $3.04
PE Ratio NTR : 13.65 T : 7.39
PEG Ratio NTR : 0.20 T : 0.31
PS Ratio NTR : 1.17 T : 1.29
Total Revenue (TTM) NTR : $27.76B T : $125.65B
Gross Profit (TTM) NTR : $8.66B T : $105.41B
EBITDA (TTM) NTR : $6.33B T : $54.70B

Return for Risk

NTR vs. T — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NTR

NTR Risk / Return Rank: 58
NTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
NTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
NTR Omega Ratio Rank: 53
NTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
NTR Martin Ratio Rank: 62

T

T Risk / Return Rank: 11
T Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
T Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
T Omega Ratio Rank: 13
T Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
T Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NTR vs. T - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nutrien Ltd. (NTR) and AT&T Inc. (T). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NTR	T	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.53	-0.75	+1.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.93	-0.98	+1.91
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	0.89	+0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.86	-0.75	+1.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.06	-1.59	+3.64
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NTR vs. T - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NTR Sharpe Ratio is 0.53, which is higher than the T Sharpe Ratio of -0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NTR and T, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NTR	T	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53	-0.75	+1.28
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.13	0.28	-0.15
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.12	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.18	0.38	-0.19

Drawdowns

NTR vs. T - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NTR drawdown since its inception was -57.80%, smaller than the maximum T drawdown of -64.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTR and T.

Drawdown Indicators

	NTR	T	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.80%	-64.15%	+6.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.36%	-21.87%	+2.51%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.82%	-21.87%	-10.95%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-57.80%	-32.01%	-25.79%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-42.35%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-31.68%	-21.87%	-9.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.17%	-15.72%	-10.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.08%	10.34%	-2.26%

Volatility

NTR vs. T - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nutrien Ltd. (NTR) is 6.83%, while AT&T Inc. (T) has a volatility of 7.50%. This indicates that NTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than T based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NTR	T	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.83%	7.50%	-0.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.59%	17.57%	+8.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.67%	21.98%	+9.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.18%	23.97%	+10.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.97%	23.71%	+10.26%

Dividends

NTR vs. T - Dividend Comparison

NTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%, less than T's 4.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NTR Nutrien Ltd.	3.25%	3.53%	4.83%	3.76%	3.51%	2.45%	3.74%	3.67%	3.47%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
T AT&T Inc.	4.93%	4.47%	4.87%	6.62%	6.66%	8.46%	7.23%	5.22%	7.01%	5.04%	4.51%	5.46%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NTR and T in my portfolio?

NTR and T have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NTR or T?

T has higher volatility (7.50%) compared to NTR (6.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTR dropped -57.80% vs T's -64.15%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.53 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.