PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NTR vs. COMT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NTR vs. COMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nutrien Ltd. (NTR) and iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF (COMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NTR achieves a 7.75% return, which is significantly lower than COMT's 26.00% return.


NTR

1D
1.33%
1M
0.71%
6M
11.17%
YTD
7.75%
1Y
11.02%
3Y*
6.86%
5Y*
5.01%
10Y*

COMT

1D
-0.17%
1M
-4.70%
6M
23.49%
YTD
26.00%
1Y
27.75%
3Y*
11.57%
5Y*
11.09%
10Y*
7.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NTR vs. COMT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
NTR
Nutrien Ltd.
7.75%43.33%-16.97%-20.19%0.23%60.78%5.60%5.57%-7.73%
COMT
iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF
26.00%6.07%5.96%-6.56%19.45%36.88%-18.66%10.81%-6.67%

Correlation

The correlation between NTR and COMT is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2018

0.39

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NTR vs. COMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NTR
NTR Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
NTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTR Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
NTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTR Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

COMT
COMT Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
COMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
COMT Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
COMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
COMT Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NTR vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nutrien Ltd. (NTR) and iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NTRCOMTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.24

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.41

1.66

-1.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.12

5.78

-4.66

NTR vs. COMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NTR Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is lower than the COMT Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NTR and COMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NTR vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NTR drawdown since its inception was -57.80%, which is greater than COMT's maximum drawdown of -51.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTR and COMT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NTRCOMTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.80%

-51.89%

-5.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.56%

-17.57%

-9.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.82%

-17.57%

-15.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.80%

-29.00%

-28.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.96%

-14.13%

-18.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.25%

-23.97%

-2.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.14%

5.05%

+5.09%

Volatility

NTR vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison

Nutrien Ltd. (NTR) has a higher volatility of 8.92% compared to iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF (COMT) at 5.68%. This indicates that NTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NTRCOMTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.92%

5.68%

+3.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.80%

19.60%

+6.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.15%

21.45%

+10.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.17%

21.17%

+13.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.95%

18.84%

+15.11%

Dividends

NTR vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison

NTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%, less than COMT's 6.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COMT
iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF
6.14%7.74%4.90%5.19%29.79%17.79%0.36%2.61%11.65%5.16%0.52%1.44%
NTR
Nutrien Ltd.
3.35%3.53%4.83%3.76%3.51%2.45%3.74%3.67%3.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NTR and COMT have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NTR has higher volatility (8.92%) compared to COMT (5.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTR dropped -57.80% vs COMT's -51.89%.

COMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NTR and COMT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer