NTR vs. AMSC
NTR (Nutrien Ltd.) and AMSC (American Superconductor Corporation) are both stocks. NTR operates in Agricultural Inputs (Basic Materials), while AMSC operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials). Over the past 5 years, NTR returned 5.01%/yr vs 17.38%/yr for AMSC. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NTR vs. AMSC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NTR achieves a 7.75% return, which is significantly lower than AMSC's 24.95% return.
NTR
- 1D
- 1.33%
- 1M
- 0.71%
- 6M
- 11.17%
- YTD
- 7.75%
- 1Y
- 11.02%
- 3Y*
- 6.86%
- 5Y*
- 5.01%
- 10Y*
- —
AMSC
- 1D
- -3.26%
- 1M
- -8.99%
- 6M
- 17.25%
- YTD
- 24.95%
- 1Y
- -8.20%
- 3Y*
- 75.08%
- 5Y*
- 17.38%
- 10Y*
- 14.23%
NTR vs. AMSC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NTR Nutrien Ltd. | 7.75% | 43.33% | -16.97% | -20.19% | 0.23% | 60.78% | 5.60% | 5.57% | -7.73% |
AMSC American Superconductor Corporation | 24.95% | 16.85% | 121.10% | 202.72% | -66.18% | -53.54% | 198.34% | -29.60% | 207.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between NTR and AMSC is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2018 | 0.24 |
Over the past year, the correlation between NTR and AMSC has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.24, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
NTR:
$31.41B
AMSC:
$1.74B
NTR:
$4.94
AMSC:
$2.95
NTR:
13.24
AMSC:
12.17
NTR:
0.20
AMSC:
0.02
NTR:
1.14
AMSC:
5.44
NTR:
1.25
AMSC:
3.03
NTR:
$27.76B
AMSC:
$299.15M
NTR:
$8.66B
AMSC:
$91.38M
NTR:
$6.33B
AMSC:
$19.29M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NTR vs. AMSC — Risk / Return Rank
NTR
AMSC
NTR vs. AMSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nutrien Ltd. (NTR) and American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NTR | AMSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.06 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.41 | -0.16 | +0.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.12 | -0.25 | +1.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NTR vs. AMSC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NTR drawdown since its inception was -57.80%, smaller than the maximum AMSC drawdown of -99.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTR and AMSC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NTR | AMSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.80% | -99.57% | +41.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.56% | -61.08% | +33.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.82% | -63.86% | +31.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.80% | -82.94% | +25.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -89.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.96% | -94.81% | +61.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.25% | -75.80% | +49.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.14% | 38.03% | -27.89% |
Volatility
NTR vs. AMSC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Nutrien Ltd. (NTR) is 8.92%, while American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) has a volatility of 22.33%. This indicates that NTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NTR | AMSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.92% | 22.33% | -13.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.80% | 54.94% | -29.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.15% | 85.50% | -53.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.17% | 87.45% | -53.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.95% | 79.28% | -45.33% |
Dividends
NTR vs. AMSC - Dividend Comparison
NTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%, while AMSC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMSC American Superconductor Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NTR Nutrien Ltd. | 3.35% | 3.53% | 4.83% | 3.76% | 3.51% | 2.45% | 3.74% | 3.67% | 3.47% |
Financials
NTR vs. AMSC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nutrien Ltd. and American Superconductor Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
NTR vs. AMSC - Profitability Comparison
NTR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Nutrien Ltd. reported a gross profit of 1.62B and revenue of 5.96B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.2%.
AMSC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, American Superconductor Corporation reported a gross profit of 23.60M and revenue of 86.41M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.3%.
NTR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Nutrien Ltd. reported an operating income of 419.11M and revenue of 5.96B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.0%.
AMSC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, American Superconductor Corporation reported an operating income of -522.00K and revenue of 86.41M, resulting in an operating margin of -0.6%.
NTR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Nutrien Ltd. reported a net income of 129.19M and revenue of 5.96B, resulting in a net margin of 2.2%.
AMSC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, American Superconductor Corporation reported a net income of 4.53M and revenue of 86.41M, resulting in a net margin of 5.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
NTR and AMSC have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMSC has higher volatility (22.33%) compared to NTR (8.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTR dropped -57.80% vs AMSC's -99.57%.
NTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.36 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NTR and AMSC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer