NTNYX vs. RMUNX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

NTNYX (Nuveen New York Municipal Bond Fund) and RMUNX (Invesco Rochester New York Municipals Fund) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, NTNYX returned 1.92%/yr vs 3.59%/yr for RMUNX. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NTNYX charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for RMUNX.

Performance

NTNYX vs. RMUNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen New York Municipal Bond Fund (NTNYX) and Invesco Rochester New York Municipals Fund (RMUNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NTNYX achieves a 2.14% return, which is significantly higher than RMUNX's 1.92% return. Over the past 10 years, NTNYX has underperformed RMUNX with an annualized return of 1.92%, while RMUNX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.59% annualized return.

NTNYX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.93%
• YTD: 2.14%
• 6M: 2.49%
• 1Y: 7.15%
• 3Y*: 3.62%
• 5Y*: 0.40%
• 10Y*: 1.92%

RMUNX

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 2.59%
• YTD: 1.92%
• 6M: 2.47%
• 1Y: 6.63%
• 3Y*: 3.35%
• 5Y*: -0.02%
• 10Y*: 3.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NTNYX vs. RMUNX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NTNYX Nuveen New York Municipal Bond Fund	2.14%	2.71%	2.44%	7.37%	-12.23%	3.22%	4.11%	7.99%	0.48%	6.06%
RMUNX Invesco Rochester New York Municipals Fund	1.92%	0.82%	2.37%	9.85%	-15.09%	6.83%	5.84%	13.22%	8.89%	3.69%

Correlation

The correlation between NTNYX and RMUNX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1990	0.72

The correlation between NTNYX and RMUNX shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (all time) to 0.92 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

NTNYX vs. RMUNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NTNYX

NTNYX Risk / Return Rank: 74
NTNYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
NTNYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
NTNYX Omega Ratio Rank: 90
NTNYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
NTNYX Martin Ratio Rank: 44

RMUNX

RMUNX Risk / Return Rank: 39
RMUNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
RMUNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
RMUNX Omega Ratio Rank: 49
RMUNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
RMUNX Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NTNYX vs. RMUNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen New York Municipal Bond Fund (NTNYX) and Invesco Rochester New York Municipals Fund (RMUNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NTNYX	RMUNX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.47	1.65	+0.82
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.00	2.54	+1.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.61	1.35	+0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.97	2.24	+0.74
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.81	6.22	+2.59

NTNYX vs. RMUNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NTNYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is higher than the RMUNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NTNYX and RMUNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NTNYX vs. RMUNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NTNYX drawdown since its inception was -21.49%, smaller than the maximum RMUNX drawdown of -36.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTNYX and RMUNX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NTNYX	RMUNX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.49%	-36.55%	+15.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.46%	-3.29%	+0.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.76%	-10.10%	+2.34%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.65%	-21.81%	+4.16%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-17.65%	-21.81%	+4.16%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.95%	+1.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.43%	-3.25%	+0.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.83%	1.43%	-0.60%

Volatility

NTNYX vs. RMUNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen New York Municipal Bond Fund (NTNYX) is 0.83%, while Invesco Rochester New York Municipals Fund (RMUNX) has a volatility of 1.19%. This indicates that NTNYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RMUNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NTNYX	RMUNX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.83%	1.19%	-0.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.11%	3.13%	-1.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.97%	4.46%	-1.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.67%	6.64%	-1.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.53%	6.00%	-1.47%

NTNYX vs. RMUNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NTNYX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than RMUNX's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

NTNYX vs. RMUNX - Dividend Comparison

NTNYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.80%, more than RMUNX's 3.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NTNYX Nuveen New York Municipal Bond Fund	3.80%	4.18%	4.16%	3.84%	3.39%	2.81%	2.99%	3.45%	3.42%	3.66%	3.84%	3.88%
RMUNX Invesco Rochester New York Municipals Fund	3.12%	5.30%	4.81%	3.77%	3.03%	3.24%	3.32%	3.43%	3.40%	4.34%	6.01%	6.55%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NTNYX and RMUNX in my portfolio?

NTNYX and RMUNX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NTNYX or RMUNX?

RMUNX has higher volatility (1.19%) compared to NTNYX (0.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTNYX dropped -21.49% vs RMUNX's -36.55%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NTNYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.