PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NTNX vs. MU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NTNX vs. MU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nutanix, Inc. (NTNX) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NTNX achieves a -4.60% return, which is significantly lower than MU's 244.07% return.


NTNX

1D
0.20%
1M
10.81%
YTD
-4.60%
6M
3.64%
1Y
-33.00%
3Y*
18.19%
5Y*
7.13%
10Y*

MU

1D
-1.43%
1M
22.15%
YTD
244.07%
6M
307.41%
1Y
746.93%
3Y*
144.69%
5Y*
66.21%
10Y*
55.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NTNX vs. MU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NTNX
Nutanix, Inc.
-4.60%-15.51%28.29%83.07%-18.24%-0.03%1.95%-24.84%17.89%32.83%
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
244.07%240.24%-0.96%71.93%-45.93%24.21%39.79%69.49%-22.84%87.59%

Correlation

The correlation between NTNX and MU is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2016

0.35

Over the past year, the correlation between NTNX and MU has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.35, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NTNX:

$14.40B

MU:

$1.12T

EPS

NTNX:

$0.93

MU:

$21.26

PE Ratio

NTNX:

52.74

MU:

46.18

PS Ratio

NTNX:

5.29

MU:

19.16

Total Revenue (TTM)

NTNX:

$2.75B

MU:

$58.12B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NTNX:

$2.39B

MU:

$33.96B

EBITDA (TTM)

NTNX:

$293.53M

MU:

$25.99B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NTNX vs. MU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NTNX
NTNX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
NTNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTNX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
NTNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTNX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

MU
MU Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
MU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
MU Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
MU Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MU Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NTNX vs. MU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nutanix, Inc. (NTNX) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NTNXMUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-11.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

1.78

-0.89

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.58

24.91

-25.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.96

94.64

-95.59

NTNX vs. MU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NTNX Sharpe Ratio is -0.72, which is lower than the MU Sharpe Ratio of 10.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NTNX and MU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NTNX vs. MU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NTNX drawdown since its inception was -80.40%, smaller than the maximum MU drawdown of -98.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTNX and MU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NTNXMUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.40%

-98.25%

+17.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-57.58%

-30.28%

-27.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.58%

-57.63%

-0.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-68.71%

-57.63%

-11.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.64%

-9.07%

-31.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.57%

-58.16%

+17.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

34.53%

7.95%

+26.58%

Volatility

NTNX vs. MU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nutanix, Inc. (NTNX) is 16.68%, while Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a volatility of 32.86%. This indicates that NTNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NTNXMUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.68%

32.86%

-16.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.92%

57.74%

-21.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.13%

69.66%

-23.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.73%

53.18%

-3.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

58.51%

50.12%

+8.39%

Dividends

NTNX vs. MU - Dividend Comparison

NTNX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
0.05%0.16%0.55%0.54%0.89%0.21%
NTNX
Nutanix, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

NTNX vs. MU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nutanix, Inc. and Micron Technology, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
703.07M
23.86B
(NTNX) Total Revenue
(MU) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NTNX vs. MU - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Nutanix, Inc. and Micron Technology, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
86.9%
74.4%
Portfolio components
NTNX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nutanix, Inc. reported a gross profit of 610.68M and revenue of 703.07M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.9%.

MU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 17.75B and revenue of 23.86B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.4%.

NTNX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nutanix, Inc. reported an operating income of 68.56M and revenue of 703.07M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.8%.

MU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 16.13B and revenue of 23.86B, resulting in an operating margin of 67.6%.

NTNX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nutanix, Inc. reported a net income of 72.09M and revenue of 703.07M, resulting in a net margin of 10.3%.

MU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 13.79B and revenue of 23.86B, resulting in a net margin of 57.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NTNX and MU have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MU has higher volatility (32.86%) compared to NTNX (16.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTNX dropped -80.40% vs MU's -98.25%.

MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.83 vs -0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NTNX and MU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer