NTNX vs. CHAT
NTNX (Nutanix, Inc.) is a stock, while CHAT (Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF) is Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. Over the past 3 years, NTNX returned 22.88%/yr vs 54.00%/yr for CHAT. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NTNX vs. CHAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NTNX achieves a 6.35% return, which is significantly lower than CHAT's 70.00% return.
NTNX
- 1D
- 3.64%
- 1M
- 26.57%
- YTD
- 6.35%
- 6M
- 16.68%
- 1Y
- -28.74%
- 3Y*
- 22.88%
- 5Y*
- 10.43%
- 10Y*
- —
CHAT
- 1D
- -2.47%
- 1M
- 21.73%
- YTD
- 70.00%
- 6M
- 67.89%
- 1Y
- 133.72%
- 3Y*
- 54.00%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NTNX vs. CHAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NTNX Nutanix, Inc. | 6.35% | -15.51% | 28.29% | 85.64% |
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF | 70.00% | 49.85% | 30.98% | 19.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between NTNX and CHAT is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2023 | 0.40 |
Over the past year, the correlation between NTNX and CHAT has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.40, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NTNX vs. CHAT — Risk / Return Rank
NTNX
CHAT
NTNX vs. CHAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nutanix, Inc. (NTNX) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NTNX | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.61 | -0.70 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.50 | 8.26 | -8.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.84 | 24.36 | -25.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NTNX | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.63 | 4.37 | -5.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.07 | 1.93 | -1.86 |
Drawdowns
NTNX vs. CHAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NTNX drawdown since its inception was -80.40%, which is greater than CHAT's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTNX and CHAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NTNX | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.40% | -31.34% | -49.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -57.58% | -16.28% | -41.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -58.58% | -31.34% | -27.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -68.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.83% | -3.11% | -30.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.59% | -5.35% | -35.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 34.13% | 5.51% | +28.62% |
Volatility
NTNX vs. CHAT - Volatility Comparison
Nutanix, Inc. (NTNX) has a higher volatility of 16.60% compared to Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) at 12.18%. This indicates that NTNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CHAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NTNX | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.60% | 12.18% | +4.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.59% | 24.80% | +10.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.98% | 30.81% | +15.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.71% | 29.92% | +19.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 57.17% | 29.92% | +27.25% |
Dividends
NTNX vs. CHAT - Dividend Comparison
NTNX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CHAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF | 1.68% | 2.85% |
NTNX Nutanix, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NTNX and CHAT have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NTNX has higher volatility (16.60%) compared to CHAT (12.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTNX dropped -80.40% vs CHAT's -31.34%.
CHAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.37 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NTNX and CHAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer