PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NTGY.MC vs. FCC.MC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NTGY.MC vs. FCC.MC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Naturgy Energy Group SA (NTGY.MC) and Fomento de Construcciones y Contratas, S.A. (FCC.MC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NTGY.MC achieves a 12.44% return, which is significantly higher than FCC.MC's 5.63% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NTGY.MC having a 10.48% annualized return and FCC.MC not far ahead at 10.50%.


NTGY.MC

1D
-1.45%
1M
7.84%
YTD
12.44%
6M
8.99%
1Y
15.99%
3Y*
7.68%
5Y*
11.08%
10Y*
10.48%

FCC.MC

1D
-0.68%
1M
3.74%
YTD
5.63%
6M
1.75%
1Y
-2.29%
3Y*
24.49%
5Y*
12.87%
10Y*
10.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NTGY.MC vs. FCC.MC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NTGY.MC
Naturgy Energy Group SA
12.44%17.24%-8.44%16.15%-11.87%58.67%-9.43%5.28%21.60%11.78%
FCC.MC
Fomento de Construcciones y Contratas, S.A.
5.63%28.19%-11.26%70.94%-17.74%30.10%-16.61%-3.98%35.64%14.24%

Correlation

The correlation between NTGY.MC and FCC.MC is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 1993

0.35

Over the past year, the correlation between NTGY.MC and FCC.MC has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.35, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NTGY.MC vs. FCC.MC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NTGY.MC
NTGY.MC Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
NTGY.MC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTGY.MC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTGY.MC Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
NTGY.MC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTGY.MC Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

FCC.MC
FCC.MC Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
FCC.MC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCC.MC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCC.MC Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
FCC.MC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCC.MC Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NTGY.MC vs. FCC.MC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Naturgy Energy Group SA (NTGY.MC) and Fomento de Construcciones y Contratas, S.A. (FCC.MC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NTGY.MCFCC.MCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.00

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.46

-0.08

+1.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.41

-0.13

+3.53

NTGY.MC vs. FCC.MC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NTGY.MC Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is higher than the FCC.MC Sharpe Ratio of -0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NTGY.MC and FCC.MC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NTGY.MCFCC.MCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

-0.07

+0.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.48

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.37

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.18

+0.19

Drawdowns

NTGY.MC vs. FCC.MC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NTGY.MC drawdown since its inception was -76.92%, smaller than the maximum FCC.MC drawdown of -87.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTGY.MC and FCC.MC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NTGY.MCFCC.MCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.92%

-87.82%

+10.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.33%

-18.24%

+6.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.51%

-22.60%

-7.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.51%

-31.29%

+0.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.22%

-44.95%

-0.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.41%

-47.45%

+43.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.88%

-48.20%

+23.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.90%

11.78%

-6.88%

Volatility

NTGY.MC vs. FCC.MC - Volatility Comparison

Naturgy Energy Group SA (NTGY.MC) has a higher volatility of 7.04% compared to Fomento de Construcciones y Contratas, S.A. (FCC.MC) at 3.78%. This indicates that NTGY.MC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCC.MC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NTGY.MCFCC.MCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.04%

3.78%

+3.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.59%

14.23%

+2.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.69%

20.20%

+0.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.35%

26.19%

-3.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.46%

28.01%

-4.55%

Dividends

NTGY.MC vs. FCC.MC - Dividend Comparison

NTGY.MC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.01%, more than FCC.MC's 3.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCC.MC
Fomento de Construcciones y Contratas, S.A.
3.48%3.68%4.23%2.78%3.67%2.92%3.68%2.97%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NTGY.MC
Naturgy Energy Group SA
5.01%5.62%5.18%4.50%4.00%3.76%6.04%4.83%5.09%4.21%6.02%3.86%

Financials

NTGY.MC vs. FCC.MC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Naturgy Energy Group SA and Fomento de Construcciones y Contratas, S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in EUR except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


NTGY.MC and FCC.MC have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NTGY.MC and FCC.MC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer