PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NTGY.MC vs. BNP.PA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NTGY.MC vs. BNP.PA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Naturgy Energy Group SA (NTGY.MC) and BNP Paribas SA (BNP.PA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NTGY.MC achieves a 12.44% return, which is significantly lower than BNP.PA's 19.76% return. Over the past 10 years, NTGY.MC has underperformed BNP.PA with an annualized return of 10.48%, while BNP.PA has yielded a comparatively higher 13.30% annualized return.


NTGY.MC

1D
-1.45%
1M
7.84%
YTD
12.44%
6M
8.99%
1Y
15.99%
3Y*
7.68%
5Y*
11.08%
10Y*
10.48%

BNP.PA

1D
0.83%
1M
3.58%
YTD
19.76%
6M
28.34%
1Y
29.11%
3Y*
26.67%
5Y*
18.63%
10Y*
13.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NTGY.MC vs. BNP.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NTGY.MC
Naturgy Energy Group SA
12.44%17.24%-8.44%16.15%-11.87%58.67%-9.43%5.28%21.60%11.78%
BNP.PA
BNP Paribas SA
19.76%50.14%0.99%25.73%-5.95%47.88%-18.41%43.63%-33.05%7.17%

Correlation

The correlation between NTGY.MC and BNP.PA is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 1993

0.34

The correlation between NTGY.MC and BNP.PA shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NTGY.MC vs. BNP.PA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NTGY.MC
NTGY.MC Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
NTGY.MC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTGY.MC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTGY.MC Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
NTGY.MC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTGY.MC Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

BNP.PA
BNP.PA Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
BNP.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNP.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNP.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
BNP.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNP.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NTGY.MC vs. BNP.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Naturgy Energy Group SA (NTGY.MC) and BNP Paribas SA (BNP.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NTGY.MCBNP.PADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.20

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.46

1.55

-0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.41

3.93

-0.53

NTGY.MC vs. BNP.PA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NTGY.MC Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is comparable to the BNP.PA Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NTGY.MC and BNP.PA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NTGY.MCBNP.PADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

1.07

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.64

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.42

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.25

+0.13

Drawdowns

NTGY.MC vs. BNP.PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NTGY.MC drawdown since its inception was -76.92%, roughly equal to the maximum BNP.PA drawdown of -75.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTGY.MC and BNP.PA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NTGY.MCBNP.PADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.92%

-75.43%

-1.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.33%

-19.50%

+8.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.51%

-21.82%

-8.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.51%

-34.11%

+3.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.22%

-59.43%

+14.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.41%

-0.49%

-3.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.88%

-19.98%

-4.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.90%

7.67%

-2.77%

Volatility

NTGY.MC vs. BNP.PA - Volatility Comparison

Naturgy Energy Group SA (NTGY.MC) and BNP Paribas SA (BNP.PA) have volatilities of 7.04% and 7.11%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NTGY.MCBNP.PADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.04%

7.11%

-0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.59%

20.83%

-4.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.69%

28.23%

-7.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.35%

28.42%

-6.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.46%

31.19%

-7.73%

Dividends

NTGY.MC vs. BNP.PA - Dividend Comparison

NTGY.MC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.01%, less than BNP.PA's 5.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BNP.PA
BNP Paribas SA
5.49%9.13%7.77%6.23%6.89%4.38%0.00%5.72%7.65%4.34%3.82%2.87%
NTGY.MC
Naturgy Energy Group SA
5.01%5.62%5.18%4.50%4.00%3.76%6.04%4.83%5.09%4.21%6.02%3.86%

Financials

NTGY.MC vs. BNP.PA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Naturgy Energy Group SA and BNP Paribas SA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in EUR except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


NTGY.MC and BNP.PA have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NTGY.MC and BNP.PA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer