PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NTAUX vs. NOEMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NTAUX vs. NOEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Tax-Advantaged U-S Fixed Income (NTAUX) and Northern Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund (NOEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NTAUX vs. NOEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NTAUX
Northern Tax-Advantaged U-S Fixed Income
0.57%2.60%3.52%4.06%-1.59%-0.03%1.49%2.52%1.39%0.83%
NOEMX
Northern Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund
2.41%33.67%7.10%9.20%-20.53%-3.36%17.63%18.32%-15.04%37.34%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NTAUX achieves a 0.57% return, which is significantly lower than NOEMX's 2.41% return. Over the past 10 years, NTAUX has underperformed NOEMX with an annualized return of 1.57%, while NOEMX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.71% annualized return.


NTAUX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.36%
YTD
0.57%
6M
1.17%
1Y
3.08%
3Y*
3.13%
5Y*
1.79%
10Y*
1.57%

NOEMX

1D
1.43%
1M
-10.05%
YTD
2.41%
6M
5.83%
1Y
31.13%
3Y*
15.35%
5Y*
3.42%
10Y*
7.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NTAUX vs. NOEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NTAUX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than NOEMX's 0.22% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

NTAUX vs. NOEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NTAUX
NTAUX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
NTAUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTAUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTAUX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
NTAUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTAUX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

NOEMX
NOEMX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
NOEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
NOEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NTAUX vs. NOEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Tax-Advantaged U-S Fixed Income (NTAUX) and Northern Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund (NOEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NTAUXNOEMXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.41

1.89

+0.52

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.17

2.52

+1.65

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

2.11

1.37

+0.74

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.49

2.09

+1.40

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

19.22

7.91

+11.31

NTAUX vs. NOEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NTAUX Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is comparable to the NOEMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NTAUX and NOEMX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NTAUXNOEMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.41

1.89

+0.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.70

0.21

+1.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.65

0.45

+1.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.60

0.21

+1.39

Correlation

The correlation between NTAUX and NOEMX is 0.03, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

NTAUX vs. NOEMX - Dividend Comparison

NTAUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, more than NOEMX's 2.47% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NTAUX
Northern Tax-Advantaged U-S Fixed Income
3.04%2.27%3.15%1.96%0.68%0.46%1.09%1.69%1.38%0.93%0.81%0.61%
NOEMX
Northern Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund
2.47%2.53%2.98%3.86%2.42%2.87%2.36%3.24%2.76%1.74%1.92%2.54%

Drawdowns

NTAUX vs. NOEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NTAUX drawdown since its inception was -2.95%, smaller than the maximum NOEMX drawdown of -66.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTAUX and NOEMX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NTAUXNOEMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.95%

-66.67%

+63.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.88%

-13.06%

+12.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-2.95%

-37.28%

+34.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-2.95%

-39.49%

+36.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.36%

-11.81%

+11.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.20%

-19.16%

+18.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.16%

3.59%

-3.43%

Volatility

NTAUX vs. NOEMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Northern Tax-Advantaged U-S Fixed Income (NTAUX) is 0.32%, while Northern Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund (NOEMX) has a volatility of 7.56%. This indicates that NTAUX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NOEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NTAUXNOEMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.32%

7.56%

-7.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.74%

12.09%

-11.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.30%

17.35%

-16.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.06%

16.10%

-15.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.96%

17.41%

-16.45%