PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NTAP vs. P
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NTAP vs. P - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NetApp, Inc. (NTAP) and Everpure, Inc. (P). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NTAP achieves a 52.42% return, which is significantly higher than P's 7.91% return. Over the past 10 years, NTAP has outperformed P with an annualized return of 23.98%, while P has yielded a comparatively lower 21.03% annualized return.


NTAP

1D
0.71%
1M
34.75%
YTD
52.42%
6M
41.13%
1Y
63.93%
3Y*
32.90%
5Y*
16.85%
10Y*
23.98%

P

1D
4.28%
1M
-10.93%
YTD
7.91%
6M
1.39%
1Y
40.00%
3Y*
25.48%
5Y*
30.55%
10Y*
21.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NTAP vs. P - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NTAP
NetApp, Inc.
52.42%-5.87%34.16%51.15%-32.92%42.47%10.94%7.43%9.67%59.94%
P
Everpure, Inc.
7.91%9.08%72.27%33.26%-17.79%43.96%32.14%6.41%1.39%40.23%

Correlation

The correlation between NTAP and P is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2015

0.58

The correlation between NTAP and P has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NTAP:

$32.16B

P:

$23.61B

EPS

NTAP:

$6.35

P:

$0.56

PE Ratio

NTAP:

25.46

P:

129.77

PEG Ratio

NTAP:

1.91

P:

4.02

PS Ratio

NTAP:

4.69

P:

6.67

Total Revenue (TTM)

NTAP:

$6.93B

P:

$3.66B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NTAP:

$4.90B

P:

$2.58B

EBITDA (TTM)

NTAP:

$1.89B

P:

$306.67M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NTAP vs. P — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NTAP
NTAP Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
NTAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTAP Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
NTAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTAP Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

P
P Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
P Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
P Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
P Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
P Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
P Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NTAP vs. P - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NetApp, Inc. (NTAP) and Everpure, Inc. (P). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NTAPPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.16

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.43

0.78

+1.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.01

1.50

+3.52

NTAP vs. P - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NTAP Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is higher than the P Sharpe Ratio of 0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NTAP and P, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NTAP vs. P - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NTAP drawdown since its inception was -96.21%, which is greater than P's maximum drawdown of -69.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTAP and P.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NTAPPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.21%

-69.43%

-26.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.83%

-42.26%

+17.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.61%

-48.63%

+6.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.61%

-48.63%

+6.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.08%

-69.43%

+11.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.75%

-26.74%

+15.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-57.06%

-24.44%

-32.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.01%

21.89%

-9.88%

Volatility

NTAP vs. P - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NetApp, Inc. (NTAP) is 25.54%, while Everpure, Inc. (P) has a volatility of 26.95%. This indicates that NTAP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than P based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NTAPPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.54%

26.95%

-1.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.56%

45.02%

-10.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.46%

68.32%

-27.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.90%

52.74%

-18.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.95%

51.15%

-15.20%

Dividends

NTAP vs. P - Dividend Comparison

NTAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, while P has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NTAP
NetApp, Inc.
1.29%1.94%1.76%2.27%3.33%2.13%2.90%2.83%2.01%1.41%2.10%2.60%
P
Everpure, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

NTAP vs. P - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NetApp, Inc. and Everpure, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B20222023202420252026
1.95B
778.49M
(NTAP) Total Revenue
(P) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NTAP vs. P - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between NetApp, Inc. and Everpure, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

64.0%66.0%68.0%70.0%72.0%20222023202420252026
70.1%
68.9%
Portfolio components
NTAP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NetApp, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.37B and revenue of 1.95B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.1%.

P - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Everpure, Inc. reported a gross profit of 536.15M and revenue of 778.49M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.9%.

NTAP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NetApp, Inc. reported an operating income of 535.00M and revenue of 1.95B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.5%.

P - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Everpure, Inc. reported an operating income of -31.17M and revenue of 778.49M, resulting in an operating margin of -4.0%.

NTAP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NetApp, Inc. reported a net income of 404.00M and revenue of 1.95B, resulting in a net margin of 20.7%.

P - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Everpure, Inc. reported a net income of -14.00M and revenue of 778.49M, resulting in a net margin of -1.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NTAP and P have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

P has higher volatility (26.95%) compared to NTAP (25.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTAP dropped -96.21% vs P's -69.43%.

NTAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NTAP and P

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer