NTAP vs. IRM
Compare and contrast key facts about NetApp, Inc. (NTAP) and Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: NTAP or IRM.
Correlation
The correlation between NTAP and IRM is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
NTAP vs. IRM - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
NTAP:
1.11
IRM:
2.08
NTAP:
1.78
IRM:
2.53
NTAP:
1.24
IRM:
1.36
NTAP:
1.38
IRM:
2.80
NTAP:
5.52
IRM:
11.56
NTAP:
6.42%
IRM:
4.89%
NTAP:
31.91%
IRM:
27.21%
NTAP:
-96.21%
IRM:
-55.71%
NTAP:
-11.35%
IRM:
-17.08%
Fundamentals
NTAP:
$24.90B
IRM:
$32.31B
NTAP:
$5.43
IRM:
$0.36
NTAP:
22.56
IRM:
305.81
NTAP:
1.92
IRM:
1.08
NTAP:
$6.47B
IRM:
$5.99B
NTAP:
$4.60B
IRM:
$2.94B
NTAP:
$1.72B
IRM:
$2.36B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NTAP achieves a 37.35% return, which is significantly lower than IRM's 55.17% return. Over the past 10 years, NTAP has underperformed IRM with an annualized return of 13.71%, while IRM has yielded a comparatively higher 16.94% annualized return.
NTAP
37.35%
-2.86%
-6.19%
35.45%
17.04%
13.71%
IRM
55.17%
-10.78%
20.75%
56.54%
34.05%
16.94%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
NTAP vs. IRM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NetApp, Inc. (NTAP) and Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
NTAP vs. IRM - Dividend Comparison
NTAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, less than IRM's 2.59% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NTAP NetApp, Inc. | 1.72% | 2.27% | 3.33% | 2.13% | 2.90% | 2.83% | 2.01% | 1.41% | 2.10% | 2.60% | 1.52% | 0.73% |
IRM Iron Mountain Incorporated | 2.59% | 3.63% | 4.97% | 4.73% | 8.40% | 7.69% | 7.33% | 5.93% | 6.17% | 7.07% | 6.05% | 4.52% |
Drawdowns
NTAP vs. IRM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NTAP drawdown since its inception was -96.21%, which is greater than IRM's maximum drawdown of -55.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTAP and IRM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
NTAP vs. IRM - Volatility Comparison
NetApp, Inc. (NTAP) has a higher volatility of 12.10% compared to Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM) at 10.08%. This indicates that NTAP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IRM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
NTAP vs. IRM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NetApp, Inc. and Iron Mountain Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities