PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NSTLX vs. BRW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NSTLX vs. BRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Strategic Income Fund (NSTLX) and Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund (BRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NSTLX achieves a 0.56% return, which is significantly lower than BRW's 2.91% return.


NSTLX

1D
-0.20%
1M
0.36%
YTD
0.56%
6M
0.92%
1Y
6.18%
3Y*
7.33%
5Y*
2.73%
10Y*
4.04%

BRW

1D
-0.88%
1M
-0.08%
YTD
2.91%
6M
0.69%
1Y
1.98%
3Y*
9.77%
5Y*
6.92%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NSTLX vs. BRW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
NSTLX
Neuberger Berman Strategic Income Fund
0.56%9.44%6.02%10.07%-11.81%1.60%
BRW
Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund
2.91%5.89%12.16%18.49%-4.64%3.19%

Correlation

The correlation between NSTLX and BRW is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2021

0.22

The correlation between NSTLX and BRW shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (1 year) to 0.22 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NSTLX vs. BRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NSTLX
NSTLX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
NSTLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NSTLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
NSTLX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
NSTLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
NSTLX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

BRW
BRW Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
BRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRW Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
BRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRW Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NSTLX vs. BRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Strategic Income Fund (NSTLX) and Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund (BRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NSTLXBRWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.04

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.02

0.11

+1.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.35

0.20

+7.15

NSTLX vs. BRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NSTLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is higher than the BRW Sharpe Ratio of 0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NSTLX and BRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NSTLXBRWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

0.15

+1.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.54

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

0.57

+0.30

Drawdowns

NSTLX vs. BRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NSTLX drawdown since its inception was -19.00%, which is greater than BRW's maximum drawdown of -17.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NSTLX and BRW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NSTLXBRWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.00%

-17.74%

-1.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.30%

-17.74%

+14.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.85%

-17.74%

+12.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.65%

-17.74%

+1.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.06%

-9.32%

+8.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.70%

-3.93%

+1.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.90%

9.88%

-8.98%

Volatility

NSTLX vs. BRW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Neuberger Berman Strategic Income Fund (NSTLX) is 1.37%, while Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund (BRW) has a volatility of 2.43%. This indicates that NSTLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NSTLXBRWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.37%

2.43%

-1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.88%

7.55%

-4.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.62%

13.17%

-9.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.06%

12.83%

-7.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.99%

12.86%

-7.87%

NSTLX vs. BRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

NSTLX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than BRW's 1.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

NSTLX vs. BRW - Dividend Comparison

NSTLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.55%, less than BRW's 15.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BRW
Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund
15.03%14.46%12.27%16.02%13.82%4.53%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NSTLX
Neuberger Berman Strategic Income Fund
5.55%5.46%5.31%5.38%3.92%6.29%3.81%4.02%4.33%3.64%3.54%4.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


NSTLX and BRW have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BRW has higher volatility (2.43%) compared to NSTLX (1.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NSTLX dropped -19.00% vs BRW's -17.74%.

NSTLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NSTLX and BRW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer