NSMIX vs. LBSAX
NSMIX (Columbia Short Term Municipal Bond Fund) and LBSAX (Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class A) are both mutual funds - NSMIX is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by Columbia, while LBSAX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Columbia. Over the past 10 years, NSMIX returned 1.70%/yr vs 12.31%/yr for LBSAX. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. NSMIX charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for LBSAX.
Performance
NSMIX vs. LBSAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NSMIX achieves a 1.03% return, which is significantly lower than LBSAX's 8.70% return. Over the past 10 years, NSMIX has underperformed LBSAX with an annualized return of 1.70%, while LBSAX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.31% annualized return.
NSMIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.75%
- YTD
- 1.03%
- 6M
- 1.37%
- 1Y
- 3.76%
- 3Y*
- 3.67%
- 5Y*
- 1.81%
- 10Y*
- 1.70%
LBSAX
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 8.70%
- 6M
- 8.22%
- 1Y
- 21.12%
- 3Y*
- 15.58%
- 5Y*
- 11.24%
- 10Y*
- 12.31%
NSMIX vs. LBSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NSMIX Columbia Short Term Municipal Bond Fund | 1.03% | 5.01% | 2.54% | 3.59% | -3.06% | 0.57% | 1.95% | 3.24% | 1.46% | 1.53% |
LBSAX Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class A | 8.70% | 15.58% | 14.73% | 10.26% | -5.19% | 25.97% | 7.48% | 27.84% | -4.62% | 19.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between NSMIX and LBSAX is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2002 | -0.03 |
The correlation between NSMIX and LBSAX shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (all time) to 0.17 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NSMIX vs. LBSAX — Risk / Return Rank
NSMIX
LBSAX
NSMIX vs. LBSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Short Term Municipal Bond Fund (NSMIX) and Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class A (LBSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NSMIX | LBSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.05 | 1.41 | +0.64 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.59 | 3.84 | -1.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.76 | 14.45 | -5.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NSMIX vs. LBSAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NSMIX drawdown since its inception was -5.20%, smaller than the maximum LBSAX drawdown of -47.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NSMIX and LBSAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NSMIX | LBSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.20% | -47.89% | +42.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.45% | -5.52% | +4.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.97% | -13.03% | +11.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -5.20% | -17.16% | +11.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -5.20% | -32.82% | +27.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.31% | -1.03% | +0.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.37% | -5.24% | +4.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.43% | 1.47% | -1.04% |
Volatility
NSMIX vs. LBSAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Columbia Short Term Municipal Bond Fund (NSMIX) is 0.43%, while Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class A (LBSAX) has a volatility of 2.65%. This indicates that NSMIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LBSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NSMIX | LBSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.43% | 2.65% | -2.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.06% | 6.90% | -5.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.35% | 9.19% | -7.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.73% | 13.26% | -11.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.57% | 15.70% | -14.13% |
NSMIX vs. LBSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NSMIX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than LBSAX's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
NSMIX vs. LBSAX - Dividend Comparison
NSMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, less than LBSAX's 4.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LBSAX Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class A | 4.72% | 5.11% | 5.78% | 4.72% | 3.62% | 2.65% | 1.52% | 2.68% | 7.36% | 3.83% | 3.60% | 8.01% |
NSMIX Columbia Short Term Municipal Bond Fund | 2.90% | 3.58% | 2.81% | 2.01% | 1.31% | 0.95% | 1.45% | 1.93% | 1.64% | 1.33% | 1.04% | 0.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NSMIX and LBSAX have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LBSAX has higher volatility (2.65%) compared to NSMIX (0.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NSMIX dropped -5.20% vs LBSAX's -47.89%.
NSMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.78 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NSMIX and LBSAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer