PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NSITX vs. NOLCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NSITX vs. NOLCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Limited Term Tax-Exempt Fund (NSITX) and Northern Large Cap Core Fund (NOLCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NSITX achieves a 0.55% return, which is significantly lower than NOLCX's 10.60% return. Over the past 10 years, NSITX has underperformed NOLCX with an annualized return of 1.43%, while NOLCX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.11% annualized return.


NSITX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.24%
YTD
0.55%
6M
0.82%
1Y
3.50%
3Y*
3.07%
5Y*
1.09%
10Y*
1.43%

NOLCX

1D
0.40%
1M
4.66%
YTD
10.60%
6M
11.00%
1Y
31.13%
3Y*
24.12%
5Y*
15.15%
10Y*
15.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NSITX vs. NOLCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NSITX
Northern Limited Term Tax-Exempt Fund
0.55%4.01%2.34%2.73%-3.74%-0.23%3.48%4.08%1.45%1.25%
NOLCX
Northern Large Cap Core Fund
10.60%21.83%26.04%24.32%-15.59%32.90%11.96%25.64%-6.28%20.32%

Correlation

The correlation between NSITX and NOLCX is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2007

-0.06

The correlation between NSITX and NOLCX shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (all time) to 0.17 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NSITX vs. NOLCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NSITX
NSITX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
NSITX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NSITX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
NSITX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
NSITX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
NSITX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

NOLCX
NOLCX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
NOLCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOLCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOLCX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
NOLCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOLCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NSITX vs. NOLCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Limited Term Tax-Exempt Fund (NSITX) and Northern Large Cap Core Fund (NOLCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NSITXNOLCXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.42

2.76

-0.34

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.00

3.80

+0.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.77

1.50

+0.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.37

4.06

-1.70

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.64

18.97

-12.33

NSITX vs. NOLCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NSITX Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is comparable to the NOLCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NSITX and NOLCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NSITXNOLCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.42

2.76

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.80

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.79

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.96

0.54

+0.43

Drawdowns

NSITX vs. NOLCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NSITX drawdown since its inception was -7.08%, smaller than the maximum NOLCX drawdown of -56.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NSITX and NOLCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NSITXNOLCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.08%

-56.64%

+49.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.48%

-8.20%

+6.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.29%

-19.03%

+16.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.44%

-30.63%

+24.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-7.08%

-34.46%

+27.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.82%

0.00%

-0.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.82%

-8.85%

+8.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.53%

1.76%

-1.23%

Volatility

NSITX vs. NOLCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Northern Limited Term Tax-Exempt Fund (NSITX) is 0.58%, while Northern Large Cap Core Fund (NOLCX) has a volatility of 2.50%. This indicates that NSITX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NOLCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NSITXNOLCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.58%

2.50%

-1.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.15%

8.67%

-7.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.42%

11.78%

-10.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.30%

19.09%

-16.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.27%

19.26%

-16.99%

NSITX vs. NOLCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NSITX and NOLCX have an expense ratio of 0.45%.


Dividends

NSITX vs. NOLCX - Dividend Comparison

NSITX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, less than NOLCX's 7.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NOLCX
Northern Large Cap Core Fund
7.76%8.57%9.09%8.96%5.02%14.82%1.35%3.93%2.49%2.63%1.78%1.87%
NSITX
Northern Limited Term Tax-Exempt Fund
2.44%2.51%2.51%1.56%0.85%1.61%2.76%2.44%1.43%1.35%1.31%1.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


NSITX and NOLCX have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NOLCX has higher volatility (2.50%) compared to NSITX (0.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NSITX dropped -7.08% vs NOLCX's -56.64%.

NOLCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs 2.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NSITX and NOLCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer