PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NSI vs. DIEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NSI vs. DIEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in National Security Emerging Markets Index ETF (NSI) and Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NSI vs. DIEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
NSI
National Security Emerging Markets Index ETF
4.85%35.94%-1.21%4.68%
DIEM
Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF
5.34%30.81%12.29%5.73%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NSI achieves a 4.85% return, which is significantly lower than DIEM's 5.34% return.


NSI

1D
3.78%
1M
-8.34%
YTD
4.85%
6M
9.94%
1Y
37.64%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DIEM

1D
3.69%
1M
-8.22%
YTD
5.34%
6M
11.28%
1Y
34.56%
3Y*
19.05%
5Y*
7.59%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NSI vs. DIEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

NSI has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than DIEM's 0.19% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

NSI vs. DIEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NSI
NSI Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
NSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
NSI Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
NSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
NSI Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

DIEM
DIEM Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
DIEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIEM Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
DIEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NSI vs. DIEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for National Security Emerging Markets Index ETF (NSI) and Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NSIDIEMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.95

1.88

+0.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.60

2.51

+0.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.38

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.74

2.79

-0.05

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.60

11.28

-0.67

NSI vs. DIEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NSI Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is comparable to the DIEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NSI and DIEM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NSIDIEMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.95

1.88

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.03

0.42

+0.62

Correlation

The correlation between NSI and DIEM is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

NSI vs. DIEM - Dividend Comparison

NSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, less than DIEM's 2.90% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
NSI
National Security Emerging Markets Index ETF
1.61%1.69%3.39%0.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DIEM
Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF
2.90%2.99%4.92%4.45%6.31%4.06%2.75%5.98%3.87%2.61%0.35%

Drawdowns

NSI vs. DIEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NSI drawdown since its inception was -18.77%, smaller than the maximum DIEM drawdown of -38.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NSI and DIEM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NSIDIEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.77%

-38.61%

+19.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.66%

-12.33%

-1.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.40%

-9.09%

-1.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.65%

-9.86%

+6.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.53%

3.05%

+0.48%

Volatility

NSI vs. DIEM - Volatility Comparison

National Security Emerging Markets Index ETF (NSI) and Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIEM) have volatilities of 9.26% and 9.47%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NSIDIEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.26%

9.47%

-0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.45%

13.43%

+1.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.40%

18.43%

+0.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.83%

16.38%

+1.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.83%

17.41%

+0.42%